ABSTRACT
Purpose Powerlifting is clearly divided into doping tested amateur competitions and doping untested pro competitions with pro competition money prizes ranging from a few thousand USD to over $120 000 USD in a single competition. However, the results of both pro and amateur powerlifting competitions are then collected and put into the same result database (although there is the possibility to filter the results using doping control status). The powerlifting results are compared by scores to have a fair comparison between different weight class athletes. This study plays with the thought of comparing doping tested and doping untested athletes, and creates a coefficient for the comparison.
Methods The powerlifting results (noted in kg) of the 10 top ranked athletes per weight class and separately for men and women, and for doping tested and doping untested categories were collected from the openpowerlifting.org database. A weight adjusted model was fit to these results separately for men and women with the doping control status used a binary factor.
Results Doping control status was a significant factor when modelling the powerlifting results, p<0.001 for both men and women. Men’s doping untested results were 1.0725 times as large as the doping tested results. Women’s doping untested results were 1.1208 times as large as the doping tested results. These separate and precise factors could be used as coefficients for scoring doping tested and doping untested athletes’ powerlifting results. Moreover, the coefficients approximate the effect of doping on an elite level athlete’s results.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was received.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
By the Finnish Law of Medical Research (488/1999), a study using public data does not need approval by the local ethics committee. This study meets international ethical standards.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data was collected from openpowerlifting.org database February-March 2019. The full can be provided upon request.
