Abstract
Objective To determine if electrical stimulation (ES) reduces days to radiographic union of acute fractures
Data Sources MEDLINE database search using the terms combinations of “electric stimulation AND bone healing”, “electric stimulation AND fracture,” “electric stimulation AND fracture healing,” full articles, English language, without publication date restriction
Study Selection Inclusion criteria were (1) randomized-controlled trials concerning electrical stimulation for the purpose of healing acute fractures with (2) outcomes on radiographic union at regular time intervals. Exclusion criteria were (1) studies involving skeletally immature patients or (2) ES for non-unions, spinal fusions, and osteotomies.
Data Extraction Study quality was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool for risk of bias assessment by 2 independent reviewers. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed with the χ2 and I2 tests.
Data Synthesis The mean days to radiographic union was calculated as a continuous variable with standard deviations. The meta-analysis was performed to compare the ES and non-ES groups across studies using Metafor ® software (Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ, United States).
Conclusion Electrical stimulation does not reduce time to radiographic union in acute fractures. However, an improvement in the healing time was noted in the semi-invasive method of ES in which the current was delivered directly within the fracture site. This finding provides evidence that innovative methods of ES delivery may demonstrate the promising results found in smaller animal studies.
Level of Evidence Level I
- Electric Stimulation
- Bone Healing
- Fracture
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The paper is a meta-analysis and not required to be reviewed by the IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement: Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article or its supplementary materials
