Abstract
Background Inclusion of patients in healthcare service and system planning is an increasingly important tool to improve healthcare systems worldwide. In 2012, a focused healthcare reform was initiated in Austria to strengthen the primary care sector.
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the perceptions, desires and needs of patients in terms of primary care as a necessary building block of the Austrian healthcare reform.
Methods This study was designed as an exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews between the years 2013 and 2018. Research questions focused on patients’ positive and negative experiences with regard to GP consultations and the overall primary care system, as well as desires for improvement. Qualitative content analysis by Mayring was used to analyze the material.
Results Altogether, 41 interviews were conducted with seven main-categories identified. These categories include coordination and time management around consultation, human and professional aspects of consultation including coordination of care, access and availability including opening hours, infrastructure and hygiene of the waiting room, personnel, and overarching healthcare system factors.
Conclusion This study demonstrates the importance of bringing the patients’ voice into ongoing healthcare reform. Without appreciating and responding to patients’ perceptions and needs, healthcare reform in Austria might be challenged to improve in areas such as time, coordination and navigation. Successful health care reform necessitates the inclusion of the patient voice.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The current study is neither a clinical nor interventional study but an exploratory qualitative study with no risk for the participants. This study was approved and registered by the Ethics Committe of the Medical University of Vienna under the number: 224/2019.
Funding Statement
This project was partly funded by the Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the City of Vienna under the number 20032.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Positive approval of the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna was obtained under the number: 224/2019
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data (transcripts) are available upon request at the first and corresponding author.
