Abstract
Objectives To explore obstetricians, midwives, and trainees’ perceptions of CS determinants in the context of public obstetric care services provision in Argentina. Our hypothesis is that known determinants of CS use may differ in settings with limited access to essential obstetric services.
Setting We conducted a formative research study in nineteen public maternity hospitals in Argentina. An institutional survey assessed the availability of essential obstetric services. Subsequently, we conducted online surveys and semi-structured interviews to assess the opinions of providers on known CS determinants.
Results Obstetric services showed an adequate provision of emergency obstetric care but limited services to support women during birth. Midwives, with some exceptions, are not involved during labour. We received 680 surveys from obstetricians, residents, and midwives (response rate of 63%) and interviewed 26 key informants. Six out of ten providers (411, 61%) indicated that the use of CS is associated with the complexities of our caseload. Limited pain management access was deemed a potential contributing factor for CS in adolescents and first-time mothers. Providers have conflicting views on the adequacy of training to deal with complex or prolonged labour Obstetricians with more than ten years of clinical experience indicated that fear of litigation was also associated with CS. Overall, there is consensus on the need to implement interventions to reduce unnecessary CS.
Conclusions Public Maternity Hospitals in Argentina have made significant improvements in the provision of emergency services. The environment of service provision does not seem to facilitate the physiological process of vaginal birth. Providers acknowledged some of those challenges.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study is one of the few studies exploring the perceptions of providers working in low-resourced settings in middle-income countries on the determinants of increasing trends of CS.
Large sample and representation of all professionals and obstetric tasks working in low-resourced settings.
Cluster analysis allowed to describe the response variability across professional groups in relation to specific CS determinants.
The use of Formative Research is a valuable tool to inform the design and implementation of future interventions.
Even though the response rate is good (63%) those who did not respond may have different views on the determinants of CS.
Some participant hospitals had lower response rate.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
Trial registration IS002316
Clinical Protocols
https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-021-01080-4
Funding Statement
Source of funding This research was funded by the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH). Grant Number A65919 Dr Carla Perrotta also received funds to complete this research from the University College Dublin (UCD), College of Health Sciences, SEED Fund (2019) Grant number SF1735. Natalia Righetti is a research fellow funded by the Ministry of Health, Buenos Aires City Government. The study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the report and the decision to submit the paper for publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of the referred program or the other funding institutions. All authors had full access to all the data and accept responsibility to submit for publication.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The project was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee of Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales and by the provincial Ethics Committees and/or the Teaching and Research Committees at each of the selected hospitals pursuant to the requirements in each jurisdiction. It was also approved by two Ethics Committees of WHO, the Research Project Review Panel of the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) at the Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research of WHO, and the WHO Research Ethics Review Committee, Geneva, Switzerland. In Argentina, the research protocol was registered in the RENIS database (number IS002316).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail: mromero{at}cedes.org
E-mail: ysguassero{at}crep.org.ar
E-mail: Cecilia.straw{at}gmail.com
E-mail: cgialdini{at}crep.org.ar
E-mail: natirighetti{at}gmail.com
E-mail: betrana{at}who.int
E-mail: silvinaramosarcoiris{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
The data is stored on CEDES' server, encrypted. CEDES is the guardian of the dataset. Data is anonymised. Our data collection forms did not include any variable that could reveal the identity of the participants. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable demand.
