Abstract
Background This review aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic value of shock index for prediction of severe Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in high-income countries.
Method We will perform a systematic review and meta-analysis for diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). We will search CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, and other sources and include all relevant reports on the prognostic accuracy of shock index for severe PPH. The target condition is defined as severe PPH required higher-level care. Two review authors will independently screen the study eligibility and extract data from included studies. Two authors will also assess study quality using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool. We will use the hierarchical models comprising both the bivariate model and the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model for data synthesis if appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Trial registration This review is submitted with University hospital medical information network clinical trial registry (UMIN-CTR) [UMIN 000044230].
Conflicts of interest All authors declare to have no conflicts of interest
Funding None
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Not applicable
