Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A prospective, split-Face, comparative study of combined Q-switch Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion versus Q-switch Nd:YAG laser alone in treatment of melasma

View ORCID ProfileParvaneh Hatami, Hamed Nicknam Asl, View ORCID ProfileZeinab Aryanian
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.19.21257291
Parvaneh Hatami
1Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Dermatology, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Parvaneh Hatami
Hamed Nicknam Asl
3Department of Dentistry, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeinab Aryanian
1Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Dermatology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zeinab Aryanian
  • For correspondence: z_aryanian{at}yahoo.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Melasma is a common disorder of hyperpigmentation with a great effect on quality of life. In an uncontrolled study, a novel combination treatment approach, using a low-fluence Q-switched (QS) Neodymium-doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Nd:YAG) Laser in conjunction with microdermabrasion was shown to be effective in clearance of melasma(1).

Objective The purpose of the current prospective, controlled study was to determine if microdermabrasion, when combined with Nd:YAG laser, produced significant improvement of melasma compared to Nd:YAG laser alone.

Methods Twenty patients with bilaterally distributed facial melasma were subjected to QS-Nd:YAG laser therapy with microdermabrasion on one side and laser therapy alone on the other side of their faces every four weeks for three sessions. Photographs were obtained before treatment, one month and three months postoperatively.

Results Although both sides improved from baseline to the 24th week, there was no statistically significant difference between both sides in regards to MASI (Melasma Area and Severity Index) as well as PGA (Patient Global melasma improvement Assessment) scores.

Conclusion Combination therapy with Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion seems to be as effective as Q-switched Nd:YAG laser alone and doesn’t have any advantage or disadvantage in comparison with conventional laser therapy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

IRCT20191228045917N2

Funding Statement

The authors thank Iran National Elites Foundation for providing financial support.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Vice Chancellor for Research & Technology, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Central Office, Imam Ali Blvd., Rafsanjan, Iran Approval ID: IR.RUMS.REC.1394.279 Approval statement: The project was found to be in accordance to the ethical principles and the national norms and standards for conducting Medical Research in Iran

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Conflict of interest: none

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted May 22, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A prospective, split-Face, comparative study of combined Q-switch Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion versus Q-switch Nd:YAG laser alone in treatment of melasma
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A prospective, split-Face, comparative study of combined Q-switch Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion versus Q-switch Nd:YAG laser alone in treatment of melasma
Parvaneh Hatami, Hamed Nicknam Asl, Zeinab Aryanian
medRxiv 2021.05.19.21257291; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.19.21257291
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A prospective, split-Face, comparative study of combined Q-switch Nd:YAG laser and microdermabrasion versus Q-switch Nd:YAG laser alone in treatment of melasma
Parvaneh Hatami, Hamed Nicknam Asl, Zeinab Aryanian
medRxiv 2021.05.19.21257291; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.19.21257291

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Dermatology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)