Abstract
Background The rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants has made the pursuit to define correlates of protection more troublesome, despite the availability of the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin sera, a key reagent used to standardise laboratory findings into an international unitage.
Methods Using pseudotyped virus, we examine the capacity of convalescent sera, from a well-defined cohort of healthcare workers (HCW) and Patients infected during the first wave from a national critical care centre in the UK to neutralise B.1.1.298, variants of interest (VOI) B.1.617.1 (Kappa), and four VOCs, B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma) and B.1.617.2 (Delta), including the B.1.617.2 K417N, informally known as Delta Plus. We utilised the WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin to report neutralisation antibody levels in International Units per mL.
Findings Our data demonstrate a significant reduction in the ability of first wave convalescent sera to neutralise the VOCs. Patients and HCWs with more severe COVID-19 were found to have higher antibody titres and to neutralise the VOCs more effectively than individuals with milder symptoms. Using an estimated threshold for 50% protection, 54 IU/mL, we found most asymptomatic and mild cases did not produce titres above this threshold.
Interpretation Expressing our data in IU/ml, we provide a benchmark pre-vaccine standardised dataset that compares disease severity with neutralising antibody titres. Our data may now be compared across multiple laboratories. The continued use and aggregation of standardised data will eventually assist in defining correlates of protection.
Funding UKRI and NIHR; grant number G107217
Evidence before this study During the first wave outbreak, much focus was placed on the role of neutralising antibodies and titres generated upon infection to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Due to the large amounts of different assays used to elucidate the antibody-mediated immunity and laboratory to laboratory, large amounts of invaluable data could not be directly compared in order to define a correlate of protection, due to variability in the results. The WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin sera was made in order to standardise future data so that comparisons may take place.
Added value of this study Our study compares the neutralisation capacity of sera from patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) from the ancestral strain of SARS-CoV-2 against new variants, including the current variants of concern in circulation. We also provide data in International Units per mL, a standardised unitage, for infected individuals that have a clinical severity score, allowing us to assess levels of neutralising antibodies across different severities of COVID-19 disease. By providing a method to calibrate most of the variants of concern so that the WHO International Standard for anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin reagent could be used to standardise our results, therefore making them comparable to other laboratories who also standardised their data in an identical manner.
Implications of all the available evidence Continual use and accumulation of standardised data would eventually lead to defining the correlates of protection against SARS-CoV-2. This could help to inform medical staff to identify which individuals would be a greater risk of a potential reinfection to SARS-CoV-2.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
96194 12/WA/0148. Amendment 5
Funding Statement
This study was undertaken by the Humoral Immune Correlates to COVID-19 (HICC) consortium, funded by the UKRI and NIHR; grant number G107217 (COV0170 - HICC: Humoral Immune Correlates for COVID19). RW and SE received funding from the StMWK (ForCOVID, Bavaria, Germany)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Study approved by Research Ethics Committee Wales, IRAS: 96194 12/WA/0148. Amendment 5
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵8 Humoral Immune Correlates for COVID-19 Consortium
Data Availability
Raw data will made available upon request.
