Abstract
Background 98.6°F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded as 98.2°F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification?
Methods A longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northen-India were followed-up over 1-year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all the three phases of the study (i.e. non-febrile, febrile, and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study.
Results The mean oral temperature of the participants (n=144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings=6543) were 98°F (SD, 0.61) and 98.01°F (SD, 0.60) respectively (P<0.001). The mean oral temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be 0.01°F higher than non-febrile phase. With the diurnal variability, the morning (AM), noon (AN), and afternoon (PM) mean temperatures were 97.91, 98.08, and 98.27°F (P<0.001) respectively during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, and seasons.
Conclusions The mean oral temperature is 98°F (SD, 0.61). The temperature is as low as 96.90F and as high as 99.10F. The temperature during post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature like PM over AN & AM, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase, spring over others in the post-febrile phase.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Non-funded
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Emails: dr.nitinkumar2008{at}gmail.com, kavyaronanki{at}gmail.com, motherprasanna{at}rediffmail.com, mkapoorsonu{at}yahoo.co.in, dryogeshsinghaiims{at}gmail.com, ajeetsinghbhadoria{at}gmail.com
Data Availability
It is available with the corresponding author, once required, will be provided.
