Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Reproducibility of global electrical heterogeneity measurements on 12-lead ECG: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

Kazi T. Haq, Katherine J. Lutz, Kyle Peters, Natalie Craig, Evan Mitchell, Anish K. Desai, Nathan W. L. Stencel, Elsayed Z. Soliman, João A.C. Lima, View ORCID ProfileLarisa G. Tereshchenko
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.07.21258521
Kazi T. Haq
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine J. Lutz
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle Peters
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Natalie Craig
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evan Mitchell
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anish K. Desai
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan W. L. Stencel
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elsayed Z. Soliman
2Epidemiological Cardiology Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences and Department of Medicine, Cardiology Section, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC
MD, MSc, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
João A.C. Lima
3Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
MD, MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larisa G. Tereshchenko
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
3Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Larisa G. Tereshchenko
  • For correspondence: tereshch{at}ohsu.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Vectorcardiographic (VCG) global electrical heterogeneity (GEH) metrics showed clinical usefulness. We aimed to assess the reproducibility of GEH metrics.

Methods GEH was measured on two 10-second 12-lead ECGs recorded on the same day in 4,316 participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (age 69.4±9.4 y; 2317(54%) female, 1728 (40%) white, 1138(26%) African-American, 519(12%) Asian-American, 931(22%) Hispanic-American). GEH was measured on a median beat, comprised of the normal sinus (N), atrial fibrillation/flutter (S), and ventricular-paced (VP) beats. Spatial ventricular gradient’s (SVG’s) scalar was measured as sum absolute QRST integral (SAIQRST) and vector magnitude QT integral (VMQTi).

Results Two N ECGs with heart rate (HR) bias of -0.64 (95% limits of agreement [LOA] - 5.68 to 5.21) showed spatial area QRS-T angle (aQRST) bias of -0.12 (95%LOA -14.8 to 14.5). Two S ECGs with HR bias of 0.20 (95%LOA -15.8 to 16.2) showed aQRST bias of 1.37 (95%LOA -33.2 to 35.9). Two VP ECGs with HR bias of 0.25 (95%LOA -3.0 to 3.5) showed aQRST bias of -1.03 (95%LOA -11.9 to 9.9). After excluding premature arial or ventricular beat and two additional beats (before and after extrasystole), the number of cardiac beats included in a median beat did not affect the GEH reproducibility. Mean-centered log-transformed values of SAIQRST and VMQTi demonstrated perfect agreement (Bias 0; 95%LOA -0.092 to 0.092).

Conclusion GEH measurements on N, S, and VP median beats are reproducible. SVG’s scalar can be measured as either SAIQRST or VMQTi.

Significance Satisfactory reproducibility of GEH metrics supports their implementation.

Highlights

  • VCG metrics are reliably reproducible, which supports their implementation.

  • GEH is reproducible if measured during atrial fibrillation or ventricular pacing.

  • Scalar of spatial ventricular gradient can be measured as either SAIQRST or VMQTi.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Not a clinical trial

Funding Statement

This research was supported by contracts 75N92020D00001, HHSN268201500003I, N01-HC-95159, 75N92020D00005, N01-HC-95160, 75N92020D00002, N01-HC-95161, 75N92020D00003, N01-HC-95162, 75N92020D00006, N01-HC-95163, 75N92020D00004, N01-HC-95164, 75N92020D00007, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168 and N01-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and by grants UL1-TR-000040, UL1-TR-001079, and UL1-TR-001420 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (HL118277), Medical Research Foundation of Oregon, and OHSU President Bridge funding (Tereshchenko), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001420) (Soliman).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All MESA participants signed informed consent before entering the MESA study. All MESA protocols were reviewed and approved by the local MESA field center IRBs. The current study protocol was approved by the Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) institutional review board.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The MESA Study data are available through the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Biological Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center (BioLINCC), the National Center of Biotechnology Information's database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), and via MESA Coordinating Center at the University of Washington. The open-source MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) code is provided at https://physionet.org/physiotools/geh & https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab/Origin. Open-source STATA code was provided at https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab/statistics.

https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 11, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproducibility of global electrical heterogeneity measurements on 12-lead ECG: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reproducibility of global electrical heterogeneity measurements on 12-lead ECG: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Kazi T. Haq, Katherine J. Lutz, Kyle Peters, Natalie Craig, Evan Mitchell, Anish K. Desai, Nathan W. L. Stencel, Elsayed Z. Soliman, João A.C. Lima, Larisa G. Tereshchenko
medRxiv 2021.06.07.21258521; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.07.21258521
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Reproducibility of global electrical heterogeneity measurements on 12-lead ECG: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis
Kazi T. Haq, Katherine J. Lutz, Kyle Peters, Natalie Craig, Evan Mitchell, Anish K. Desai, Nathan W. L. Stencel, Elsayed Z. Soliman, João A.C. Lima, Larisa G. Tereshchenko
medRxiv 2021.06.07.21258521; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.07.21258521

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)