Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Sex-specific survival bias and interaction modeling in coronary artery disease risk prediction

Ida Surakka, View ORCID ProfileBrooke N Wolford, View ORCID ProfileScott C Ritchie, Whitney E Hornsby, Nadia R. Sutton, Maiken Elvenstad Gabrielsen, Anne Heidi Skogholt, Laurent Thomas, Michael Inouye, Kristian Hveem, View ORCID ProfileCristen J Willer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259247
Ida Surakka
aDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brooke N Wolford
bDepartment of Biostatistics and Center for Statistical Genetics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
cDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Brooke N Wolford
Scott C Ritchie
dCambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
eCambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
fBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
gBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Scott C Ritchie
Whitney E Hornsby
aDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nadia R. Sutton
aDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maiken Elvenstad Gabrielsen
hK.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Heidi Skogholt
hK.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurent Thomas
hK.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
iDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
jBioCore - Bioinformatics Core Facility, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim. Norway
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Inouye
dCambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
eCambridge Baker Systems Genomics Initiative, Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
fBritish Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
gBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
kHealth Data Research UK Cambridge, Wellcome Genome Campus and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
lDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
mThe Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristian Hveem
hK.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
nHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kristian.hveem{at}ntnu.no cristen{at}umich.edu
Cristen J Willer
aDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
cDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
nHUNT Research Centre, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Levanger, Norway
oDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cristen J Willer
  • For correspondence: kristian.hveem{at}ntnu.no cristen{at}umich.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background The 10-year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score is the standard approach to predict risk of incident cardiovascular events and recently, addition of CAD polygenic scores (PGSCAD) have been evaluated. Although age and sex strongly predict the risk of CAD, their interaction with genetic risk prediction has not been systematically examined.

Objectives This study performed an in-depth evaluation of age and sex effects in genetic CAD risk prediction.

Methods The population-based Norwegian HUNT2 cohort of 51,036 individuals was used as the primary dataset. Findings were replicated in the UK Biobank (372,410 individuals). Models for 10-year CAD risk were fitted using Cox proportional hazards and Harrell’s concordance index, sensitivity, and specificity were compared.

Results Inclusion of age and sex interactions of PGSCAD to the prediction models increased C-index and sensitivity likely countering the observed survival bias in the baseline. The sensitivity for females was lower than males in all models including genetic information. The two-step approach identified a total of 82.6% of incident CAD cases (74.1% by ASCVD risk score and an additional 8.5% by the PGSCAD interaction model).

Conclusion These findings highlight the importance and complexity of genetic risk in predicting CAD. There is a need for modeling age and sex-interactions terms with polygenic scores to optimize detection of individuals at high-risk, those who warrant preventive interventions. Sex-specific studies are needed to understand and estimate CAD risk with genetic information.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT This study used two large population-based longitudinal datasets to evaluate genetic prediction of CAD including age and sex interactions. The model fit and sensitivity of the prediction models increased when including age and sex interaction of PGSCAD to the prediction models likely countering the observed survival bias in the baseline. The sensitivity for females was lower than for males in all models including genetic information. Our results highlight the importance and complexity of genetic risk and suggest including age and sex interactions with polygenic scores to identify more high-risk individuals for preventive interventions.

Competing Interest Statement

CJWs spouse works for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. NRS serves on advisory committees for Cordis and Philips and has received honoraria for speaking from Zoll and Cordis. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding Statement

Funding: Cristen J. Willer is supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL127564, R35-HL135824, and R01-HL142023). Ida Surakka is supported by a Precision Health Scholars Award from the University of Michigan Medical School. Nadia R. Sutton is supported by the National Institutes of Health (1K76AG064426-01A1). Michael Inouye is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014) [The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care]. Acknowledgements: The authors thank the HUNT and UK Biobank participants for their contributions to research. HUNT-MI study, which comprises the genetic investigations of the HUNT Study, is a collaboration between investigators from the HUNT study and University of Michigan Medical School and the University of Michigan School of Public Health. The K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology is financed by Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) and Central Norway Regional Health Authority. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 7439. This work was supported by core funding from the: British Heart Foundation (RG/13/13/30194; RG/18/13/33946), Cambridge BHF Centre of Research Excellence (RE/13/6/30180) and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014) [The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care]. This work was also supported by Health Data Research UK, which is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome. The authors thank Kuan-Han Wu for his important graphical contributions.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Participation in the HUNT Study is based on informed consent and the study has been approved by the Data Inspectorate and the Regional Ethics Committee for Medical Research in Norway (REK: 2014/144)

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* These authors jointly supervised this work and share co-senior authorship/correspondence

  • Funding: Cristen J. Willer is supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL127564, R35-HL135824, and R01-HL142023). Ida Surakka is supported by a Precision Health Scholars Award from the University of Michigan Medical School. Nadia R. Sutton is supported by the National Institutes of Health (1K76AG064426-01A1). Michael Inouye is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014) [The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care].

  • Disclosures: CJW’s spouse works for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. NRS serves on advisory committees for Cordis and Philips and has received honoraria for speaking from Zoll and Cordis. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability

UK Biobank is freely available for research purposes (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). HUNT2 summary level data is available upon reasonable request.

  • Abbreviations

    (ASCVD)
    Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
    (Harrell’s C-index, referred to as C-index throughout the study)
    Concordance index
    (CAD)
    Coronary artery disease
    (HRs)
    Hazard ratios
    (PCE)
    Pooled Cohort Equation
    (PGS)
    polygenic score
    (HUNT)
    Trøndelag Health Study
    (UK Biobank)
    United Kingdom Biobank
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted June 28, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Sex-specific survival bias and interaction modeling in coronary artery disease risk prediction
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Sex-specific survival bias and interaction modeling in coronary artery disease risk prediction
    Ida Surakka, Brooke N Wolford, Scott C Ritchie, Whitney E Hornsby, Nadia R. Sutton, Maiken Elvenstad Gabrielsen, Anne Heidi Skogholt, Laurent Thomas, Michael Inouye, Kristian Hveem, Cristen J Willer
    medRxiv 2021.06.23.21259247; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259247
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Sex-specific survival bias and interaction modeling in coronary artery disease risk prediction
    Ida Surakka, Brooke N Wolford, Scott C Ritchie, Whitney E Hornsby, Nadia R. Sutton, Maiken Elvenstad Gabrielsen, Anne Heidi Skogholt, Laurent Thomas, Michael Inouye, Kristian Hveem, Cristen J Willer
    medRxiv 2021.06.23.21259247; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.23.21259247

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Cardiovascular Medicine
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)