ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND This study investigated clinical usage of non-invasive ventilation during physical therapy for people with cystic fibrosis. Specific research questions were: What are the clinical indications, contraindications and patient selection criteria for non-invasive ventilation use as an adjunct to physical therapy in people with cystic fibrosis? 2. Who implements non-invasive ventilation, what settings are used and how are they determined? 3. What outcome measures are used to determine the effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation as an adjunct to physical therapy and what are the main benefits and complications?
METHODS A purpose-designed survey was sent to 23 Australian cystic fibrosis centres.
RESULTS Fifteen centres (65%) responded, with 13 reporting current utilization of non-invasive ventilation to assist physical therapy. Non-invasive ventilation was most commonly (85%) used in patients with lung function <40% predicted. Physical therapy clinical indications included shortness of breath at rest (100%) and during airway clearance (100%), and fatigue during airway clearance (100%). Physical therapists were responsible for initiating non-invasive ventilation (62%), setting up (85%) and determining settings (62%). Bi-level ventilation was the only chosen ventilation mode. Benefits reported included improved ease of airway clearance (100%), reduced fatigue (92%) and decreased dyspnoea (85%). Only one complication of haemoptysis was reported.
CONCLUSIONS Non-invasive ventilation was used during physical therapy in people with cystic fibrosis who had severe disease, mostly during airway clearance to improve tolerability of treatment. Australian physical therapists initiated non-invasive ventilation when people with cystic fibrosis experienced shortness of breath or fatigue during treatment, aligning with current clinical guidelines. Clinical usage was largely consistent across centres, with numerous benefits and few complications reported. Further research is required to explore benefits of non-invasive ventilation use during physical therapy.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Nil
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics approval was obtained from the Prince Charles Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Metro North Hospital and Health Service obtained prior to the commencement of the study (HREC/16/QPCH/254)
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Data collection: Rebecca Chambers, Kathleen Hall, Robyn Cobb
Study design: Rebecca Chambers, Kathleen Hall, Robyn Cobb
Analysis of data: Molly Foxcroft, Rebecca Chambers, Kathleen Hall, Suzanne Kuys
Manuscript preparation: Molly Foxcroft, Kathleen Hall, Suzanne Kuys, Rebecca Chambers
Review of manuscript: Molly Foxcroft, Rebecca Chambers, Robyn Cobb, Suzanne Kuys, Kathleen Hall
Institution Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road, Chermside, QLD, 4032, Australia
Sources of Financial Support No funding was obtained for this research.
Conflict of Interest There are no conflicts of interest which may be perceived to interfere with or bias any stage of the writing or publication process.
Ethics approval: The Prince Charles Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, Metro North Hospital and Health Service (HREC/16/QPCH/254) approved this study.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available, however are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
