Abstract
Background As a neurodegenerative disorder with high case-fatality, there is a need to identify primary, modifiable risk factors for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Their detection has, however, proved elusive and this may be ascribed to the scarcity of well-characterised, sufficiently-powered cohort studies necessary to explore the aetiology of this rare condition.
Methods UK Biobank is an on-going, closed, prospective cohort study in which 502,524 participants (273,420 women) have been linked to national hospital and mortality registries. Baseline data collection took place between 2006 and 2010 when a range of psychosocial, physiological, and demographic data were captured.
Results Approximately 11 years of event surveillance gave rise to 301 hospitalisations and 279 deaths ascribed to ALS. After left censoring to account for reverse causality and adjustment for confounding factors, being older (hazard ratio per 10 year increase; 95% confidence interval: 1.92; 1.58, 2.33) and male (1.37; 1.00, 1.87) were associated with elevated rates of hospitalisation for ALS. Similar effects were apparent when death due to the disorder was the outcome of interest. Of the remaining 23 potential risk indices, however, there was only a suggestion that taller people experienced an increased risk of hospitalisation (per SD increase: 1.31; 1.09, 1.59).
Conclusions In the present study, a comprehensive array of potential risk indices were essentially unrelated to later ALS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
GDB is supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/P023444/1) and the US National Institute on Aging (1R56AG052519-01; 1R01AG052519-01A1).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the National Health Service National Research Ethics Service with all participants providing written informed consent. Using fully anonymised data, the present analyses did not require additional permissions.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(crg{at}mrc.soton.ac.uk)
Access to data: Data from UK Biobank (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) are available to bona fide researchers upon application. This research has been conducted under application 10279.
Funding: GDB is supported by the Medical Research Council (MR/P023444/1) and the US National Institute on Aging (1R56AG052519-01; 1R01AG052519-01A1).
Data Availability
Data from UK Biobank (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/) are available to bona fide researchers upon application.
