Abstract
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a complex disorder with heterogeneous clinical presentations that manifest variability in long-term outcomes. The genetic contributions to this clinical heterogeneity, however, are not well understood. Here, we study 14 084 individuals diagnosed with ADHD to identify several genetic factors underlying clinical heterogeneity. One genome-wide significant locus was specifically associated with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis among individuals diagnosed with ADHD and it was not previously associated with ASD nor ADHD, individually. We used a novel approach to compare profiles of polygenic scores for groups of individuals diagnosed with ADHD and uncovered robust evidence that biology is an important factor in on-going clinical debates. Specifically, individuals diagnosed with ASD and ADHD, substance use disorder (SUD) and ADHD, or first diagnosed with ADHD in adulthood had different profiles of polygenic scores for ADHD and multiple other psychiatric, cognitive, and socio-behavioral traits. A polygene overlap between an ASD diagnosis in ADHD and cognitive performance was replicated in an independent, typically developing cohort. Our unique approach uncovered evidence of genetic heterogeneity in a widely studied complex disorder, allowing for timely contributions to the understanding of ADHD etiology and providing a model for similar studies of other disorders.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The iPSYCH Initiative is funded by the Lundbeck Foundation (grant numbers R102 A9118 and R155 2014 1724), the Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Aarhus University and the university hospital in Aarhus. Genotyping of iPSYCH samples was supported by grants from the Lundbeck Foundation, the Stanley Foundation, the Simons Foundation (SFARI 311789), and NIMH (5U01MH094432 02). The IPSYCH Initiative utilize the Danish National Biobank resource that is supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation. IPSYCH data was stored and analyzed at the Computerome HPC facility (http://www.computerome.dtu.dk/) and authors are grateful for continuous support from the HPC team led by A. Syed of DTU Bioinformatics, Technical University of Denmark. AJS acknowledges support from Lundbeckfonden under the Fellowship R335 2019 2318 and the National Institute for Aging of the National Institutes of Health under awards U19AG023122, U24AG051129S1, UH2AG064706, and UH2AG064706S1. SLB acknowledges support from the Research Fund of the Mental Health Services Capital Region of Denmark R4A92, The Lundbeck Foundation R208 2015 3951 and Fonden for Faglig Udvikling af Speciallaegepraksis 38850/16. SD acknowledges research support from the European Commission (Horizon 2020, grant no 667302), Helsefonden (grant no 19 8 0260) and the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 847879. The ABCD Study is supported by the National Institutes of Health and additional federal partners under award numbers U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA041048, U01DA041089, U01DA041106, U01DA041117, U01DA041120, U01DA041134, U01DA041148, U01DA041156, U01DA041174, U24DA041123, and U24DA041147.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Danish Scientific Ethics Committee, the Danish Data Protection Agency, and the Danish Neonatal Screening Biobank Steering Committee approved the iPSYCH study. The Scientific Ethics Committee granted exemption from obtaining informed consent from participants as the study was based on the biobank material. Data access was via secure portals in accordance with Danish data protection guidelines set by the Danish Data Protection Agency, the Danish Health Data Authority, and Statistics Denmark.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data is available on request and in accordance with Danish law.
