Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Hemodilution in High Risk Cardiac Surgery: Laboratory Values, Physiological Parameters and Outcomes

Domagoj Mladinov, Luz A Padilla, Benjamin Leahy, Joseph B Norman, Jacob Enslin, Riley S Camp, Kyle W Eudailey, Kenichi Tanaka, James E Davies
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21260529
Domagoj Mladinov
*Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dmladinov{at}uabmc.edu
Luz A Padilla
**Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Leahy
*Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph B Norman
*Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacob Enslin
*Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Riley S Camp
*Division of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle W Eudailey
**Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenichi Tanaka
***Department of Anesthesiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James E Davies
**Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is a blood conservation strategy in cardiac surgery, predominantly used in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or valve procedures. Although higher complexity cardiac procedures may benefit from ANH, concerns for hemodynamic instability and organ injury during hemodilution hinder its wider acceptance. Laboratory and physiological parameters during hemodilution in complex cardiac surgeries have not been described.

Study Design and Methods This observational cohort (2019-2021) study included 169 patients who underwent thoracic aortic repair, multiple valve procedure, concomitant CABG with the aforementioned procedure, and/or redo sternotomies. Patients who received allogeneic blood were excluded. Statistical comparisons were performed between ANH (N=66) and non ANH controls (N=103). ANH consisted of removal of blood at the beginning of surgery and its return after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Results Intraoperatively, the ANH group received more albumin (p=0.04) and vasopressor medications (p=0.01); while urine output was no different between ANH and controls. Bilateral cerebral oximetry (rSO2) values were similar before and after hemodilution. During bypass rSO2 were discretely lower in the ANH vs. control group (right rSO2 p=0.03, left rSO2 (p=0.05). No differences in lactic acid values were detected across the procedural continuum. Postoperatively, no differences in extubation times, ICU length of stay, kidney injury, stroke or infection were demonstrated.

Discussion This study suggests hemodilution to be a safe and comparable blood conservation technique, even without accounting for potential benefits of reduced allogenic blood administration. The study may contribute to better understanding and wider acceptance of ANH protocols in high risk cardiac surgeries.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No external funding was received for this study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The study was approved by our Institutional Review Board (IRB-300005436), University of Alabama at Birmingham.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding: None

  • Conflict of interest: None

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (D.M.) upon reasonable request.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 19, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hemodilution in High Risk Cardiac Surgery: Laboratory Values, Physiological Parameters and Outcomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Hemodilution in High Risk Cardiac Surgery: Laboratory Values, Physiological Parameters and Outcomes
Domagoj Mladinov, Luz A Padilla, Benjamin Leahy, Joseph B Norman, Jacob Enslin, Riley S Camp, Kyle W Eudailey, Kenichi Tanaka, James E Davies
medRxiv 2021.07.14.21260529; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21260529
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Hemodilution in High Risk Cardiac Surgery: Laboratory Values, Physiological Parameters and Outcomes
Domagoj Mladinov, Luz A Padilla, Benjamin Leahy, Joseph B Norman, Jacob Enslin, Riley S Camp, Kyle W Eudailey, Kenichi Tanaka, James E Davies
medRxiv 2021.07.14.21260529; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.14.21260529

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Surgery
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)