Abstract
Objectives The comparable effectiveness of Covishield and Covaxin vaccines has not been studied. We compared the effectiveness of Covishield and Covaxin vaccines against moderate to severe COVID-19.
Methods In this retrospective observational study, we collected data of patients who were admitted with moderate to severe COVID-19. The vaccination status and comorbidities of the patients were documented. The incidence and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients was assessed. Univariate analysis was performed to determine the risk factors of in-hospital mortality.
Results Of 294 patients, 5.1% (n=15) received Covaxin and 26.5% (n=78) received Covishield; 68.4% (n=201) patients were unvaccinated. Of patients who were vaccinated and contracted COVID-19, 24.8% (n=73) had taken the first dose and 6.8% (n=20) had taken the second dose of either vaccine. The in-hospital mortality rate was 13.6% (n=40). 24/40 (60%) people who had hospital mortality were unvaccinated.3/40(7.5%) had succumbed to death after receiving double dose of Covishield, 11/40 (27.5%) had succumbed to death after receiving single dose of Covishield, 2/40(5%) had succumbed to death after receiving single dose of Covaxin, none had reported infection after receiving second dose of Covaxin. No significant association was found with the type of vaccine and the in-hospital mortality (p=0.23). Significant associations with in-hospital mortality were found with the interval before COVID-19 disease and vaccination (OR, 3.02; p=0.01); and the presence of diabetes mellitus (OR, 2.13; p=0.02), cardiovascular diseases (OR, 2.11; p<0.001), and malignancy (OR: 2.33; p=0.0325).
Conclusion There was no significant difference in the effectiveness of Covaxin and Covishield in terms of the incidence of COVID-19 and in-hospital mortality. Diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and malignancies had a significant association with in-hospital mortality in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was recieved.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee registration .All are affliated to Peerless hospital, Re Registration no- ECR/232/inst/WB/2013/RR-19 COMMITTEE MEMBERS: 1.DR.ASHOK MANDAL- Chairperson 2.DR.SUBHROJYOTI BHOWMICK 3.DR.MANOJENDRA NARAYAN BHATTACHARYA 4.DR.PAPIYA KHAWASH 5.PROF.TAMAI KANTI GHOSH 6.DR.SIKHA DUTTA 7.MRS.KUMKUM SAMADAR 8.MS.BINOTA ROY 9.MR.SWAPAN BISWAS 10.SWAMY VISHOKANANDA MAHARAJ 11.DR.MANAS RANJAN ROY Decision: Approval was given for the above study.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Some data added
Data Availability
All data are authentic.Data were collected and analysis was done accordingly.
