ABSTRACT
Restoring function to damaged neural pathways, or promoting compensatory strategies to overcome dysfunctional neural pathways have been topics of inquiry within motor rehabilitation. This study considers these topics in Parkinson’s disease (PD), where disruption within the striatal-thalamic-cortical (STC) circuits can cause impairment in internally guided (IG) movements. A related, but separate externally guided (EG) movement network, recruits the intact cerebellar-thalamic-cortical (CTC) loop to facilitate movement in response to sensory cues, and is effective in remediating motor function. Partnered dance with leading and following roles may be used as proxies for training IG and EG strategies respectively, in PD and can test which strategy is more effective in remediating effects of PD. Leaders determine variables associated with IG and communicate step amplitude, timing, and direction to the follower. Followers use an EG strategy to sense and interpret directional pressure cues from the leader and then enact an appropriate movement response. This study examines how IG and EG training strategy affects STC and CTC circuits and their behavioral outcomes to examine whether compensatory or direct entrainment of neural pathways is more effective in PD. Fifty-eight participants were recruited with mild-moderate PD (stages 1-3) and randomly assigned to EG, IG or non-dance education control group and assessed before and after 12 weeks of biweekly interventions. Participants were assessed with standard cognitive and motor behavioral measures and lay in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanner while they tapped their foot under two conditions: internal (tapping a learned rhythm: IT) and external (participant taps in response to an assistant’s felt tap on the participant’s hand: ET) guidance. The foot-tapping data collected with an accelerometer were evaluated by analyzing the frequency spectrum to calculate amplitude and timing of the foot taps. The functional (fMRI) data were pre-processed (AFNI), registered (MNI), and analyzed for changes in activation using a general linear model in SAS and AFNI. Postintervention, both the EG and the IG groups showed clinically significant changes on disease severity, but the EG group showed improvements on cognitive, motor, and mood variables. The EG group also outperformed the IG group in the in-scanner task performance measured by the foot accelerometer. Imaging data revealed a significant increase in the EG group in the primary motor cortex lower limb region and the parts of the cerebellar circuits, particularly right Cerebellar Lobule VIIIa. The control group showed an increase in activity in the putamen compared to the IG and EG groups that could be due to a different compensatory pathway. All findings were corroborated using a region of interest approach examining the same pathways according to an atlas. Our results indicate that the most effective strategy for the PD participants involved external cues that increased activity in the compensatory CTC pathway, the primary motor region, and significant improvements on almost all behavioral measurements.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT02457832
Funding Statement
Funding: Department of Veterans Affairs R&D Service Career Development Award N0870W supported this work and ME Hackney. We acknowledge the Emory Center for Health in Aging and the Emory University Center for Systems Imaging. Supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002378. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This work was supported in part by funding from a Shared Instrumentation Grant (S10) grant 1S10OD016413-01 to the Emory University Center for Systems Imaging Core and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1TR000454.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The institutional review board at Emory University School of Medicine and the Research and Development Committee of the Atlanta VA Health Care System approved this work.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The authors confirm that, for approved reasons, some access restrictions apply to the data underlying the findings. Public data deposition is not ethical or legal and would compromise patient privacy. Data are, in part, housed in the VINCI Veterans Affairs (VA) Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI), a secure, virtual computing environment developed through a partnership between the VA Office of Information Technology (OI&T) and the Veterans Health Administration's Office of Research and Development (VHA ORD). Data are also stored on a VA secured server under a Data Usage Agreement with Emory University. VINCI is a partner with the Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) and hosts all data available through CDW. VHA National Data Services (NDS) authorizes research access to patient data. Data are only available for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. Contact: VINCI{at}va.gov.
