Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent

View ORCID ProfileLinda A. Jones, Jenny R. Nelder, Joseph M. Fryer, Philip H. Alsop, Michael R. Geary, Mark Prince, View ORCID ProfileRudolf N. Cardinal
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.21260635
Linda A. Jones
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Roles: patient and public involvement lead
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Linda A. Jones
Jenny R. Nelder
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Roles: project manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph M. Fryer
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
Roles: data architect
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip H. Alsop
2Unaffiliated
Roles: research advisory group member
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Geary
2Unaffiliated
Roles: research advisory group member
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Prince
2Unaffiliated
Roles: research advisory group member
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rudolf N. Cardinal
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK
3Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, UK
Roles: university lecturer in clinical informatics and honorary consultant liaison psychiatrist
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rudolf N. Cardinal
  • For correspondence: rnc1001{at}cam.ac.uk
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

1. Abstract

BACKGROUND In the UK, National Health Service (NHS/HSC) data is variably shared between healthcare organizations for direct care, and increasingly used in de-identified forms for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including the treatment of mental health (MH) versus physical health (PH) data.

METHODS Pre-registered anonymous online survey open to all UK residents, recruiting Feb–Sep 2020. Participants were randomized to one of three framing statements regarding MH versus PH data.

FINDINGS Participants numbered 29275; 40% had experienced a MH condition. A majority supported identifiable data sharing for direct clinical care without explicit consent, but 20% opposed this. Preference for clinical/identifiable sharing decreased with distance and was slightly less for MH than PH data, with a small framing effect. Preference for research/de-identified data sharing without explicit consent showed the same small PH/MH and framing effects, plus greater preference for sharing structured data than de-identified free text. There was net support for research sharing to the NHS, academic institutions, and national research charities, net ambivalence about sharing to profit-making companies researching treatments, and net opposition to sharing to other companies (similar to sharing publicly). De-identified linkage to non-health data was generally supported, except to data held by private companies. We report demographic influences on preference. A clear majority supported a single NHS mechanism to choose uses of their data. Support for data sharing increased during the pandemic.

INTERPRETATION Support for healthcare data sharing for direct care without explicit consent is broad but not universal. There is net support for the sharing of de-identified data for research to the NHS, academia, and the charitable sector, but not the commercial sector. A single national NHS-hosted system for patients to control the use of their NHS data for clinical purposes and for research would have broad public support.

FUNDING MRC.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

ISRCTN37444142

Clinical Protocols

https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN37444142

Funding Statement

Supported by the UK Medical Research Council (Mental Health Data Pathfinder award MC_PC_17213 to RNC). Recruitment was supported by the NIHR CRN and the REDCap installation was supported in part by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014); the views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

NHS Research Ethics/Health Research Authority (HRA) approval (Integrated Research Application System identifier [ID] 268811, East of Scotland Research Ethics Service, Research Ethics Committee reference 19/ES/0144).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Full anonymous data set to be made available (with participant consent) from the University of Cambridge Data Repository -- URL to be established.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 19, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent
Linda A. Jones, Jenny R. Nelder, Joseph M. Fryer, Philip H. Alsop, Michael R. Geary, Mark Prince, Rudolf N. Cardinal
medRxiv 2021.07.19.21260635; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.21260635
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent
Linda A. Jones, Jenny R. Nelder, Joseph M. Fryer, Philip H. Alsop, Michael R. Geary, Mark Prince, Rudolf N. Cardinal
medRxiv 2021.07.19.21260635; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.21260635

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)