Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Cash versus Lotteries: COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives Experiment*

View ORCID ProfileRaymond M. Duch, View ORCID ProfileAdrian Barnett, Maciej Filipek, View ORCID ProfileLaurence Roope, Mara Violato, View ORCID ProfilePhilip Clarke
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21250865
Raymond M. Duch
1University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Raymond M. Duch
Adrian Barnett
2Queensland University of Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adrian Barnett
Maciej Filipek
3Vienna University of Economics and Business
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurence Roope
1University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurence Roope
Mara Violato
1University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip Clarke
1University of Oxford
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip Clarke
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Governments are considering financial incentives to increase vaccine uptake to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Incentives being offered include cash-equivalents such as vouchers or being entered into lotteries. Our experiment involved random assignment of 1,628 unvaccinated participants in the United States to one of three 45 second informational videos promoting vaccination with messages about: (a) health benefits of COVID-19 vaccines (control); (b) being entered into lotteries; or (c) receiving cash equivalent vouchers. After seeing the control health information video, 16% of individuals wanted information on where to get vaccinated. This compared with 14% of those assigned to the lottery video (odds ratio of 0.82 relative to control: 95% credible interval 0.57-1.17) and 22% of those assigned to the cash voucher video (odds ratio of 1.53 relative to control: 95% credible interval 1.11-2.11). These results support greater use of cash vouchers to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake and do not support the use of lottery incentives.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

Pre-registered at OSF:osf.io/adrw3

Clinical Protocols

https://osf.io/adrw3

Funding Statement

Computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the High Performance Computer and Research Support Group, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. We acknowledge the generous funding of Nuffield College for these experiments. Raymond Duch acknowledges the support provided by FONDECYT 2020 grant number 1201397. Philip Clarke, Laurence Roope and Mara Violato were partly supported by National Institute for Health Research BRC grant (University of Oxford [NIHR-BRC-1215-20008])

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The survey was conducted according to the University of Oxfords policy for human participants research and approved by the University of Oxford Medical Sciences Inter-divisional Research Ethics Committee (MS IDREC) (Approval ID: R72328/RE001). Informed consent was obtained from each participant at the beginning of the survey.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • * Computational resources and services used in this work were provided by the High Performance Computer and Research Support Group, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. We acknowledge the generous funding of Nuffield College for these experiments. Raymond Duch acknowledges the support provided by FONDECYT 2020 grant number 1201397. Philip Clarke, Laurence Roope and Mara Violato were partly supported by National Institute for Health Research BRC grant (University of Oxford [NIHR-BRC-1215-20008]) Online Supplemental Materials are available at https://github.com/CANDOUR-COVID/US-Vaccine-Incentive. Replications files and data from this project will be made available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/VaccineIncentives

Data Availability

Replications files and data from this project will be made available at the time of publication in a peer-review journal from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/VaccineIncentives

Data Availability

Replications files and data from this project will be made available at the time of publication in a peer-review journal from https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/VaccineIncentives

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted July 28, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cash versus Lotteries: COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives Experiment*
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cash versus Lotteries: COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives Experiment*
Raymond M. Duch, Adrian Barnett, Maciej Filipek, Laurence Roope, Mara Violato, Philip Clarke
medRxiv 2021.07.26.21250865; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21250865
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cash versus Lotteries: COVID-19 Vaccine Incentives Experiment*
Raymond M. Duch, Adrian Barnett, Maciej Filipek, Laurence Roope, Mara Violato, Philip Clarke
medRxiv 2021.07.26.21250865; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.26.21250865

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)