High parental vaccine motivation at a neighborhood-based vaccine and testing site serving a predominantly Latinx community

Introduction

In California, Latinx persons have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic,¹ due to structural inequalities such as having frontline occupations with increased risk of exposure unaffected by stay-at-home orders.² Neighborhood-based testing and vaccination sites that overcome structural barriers to access and that foster trust through culturally competent community staffing have proven to be a very effective means to rapidly achieve high vaccine uptake for adults in highly impacted Latinx neighborhoods^3–5 and could be leveraged to reach children as vaccines are determined to be safe and effective for younger age groups.^6,7 We sought to characterize parental attitudes about vaccinating children at a community-based testing/vaccination outdoor site serving a predominantly Latinx population in San Francisco.

Methods

Results

Of the 1,966 parents with a child <18 years old, 1,033 (53%) completed the survey. Completion rates were slightly lower among men (49%) versus women (56%) and among Latinx parents (51%) versus parents of other ethnicities (60%). Among those surveyed, 875 (85%) completed the survey immediately post-vaccination and 158 (15%) completed prior to testing. Seven hundred eighty eight respondents (76%) identified as Latinx, 88 (9%) had a child who had previously contracted COVID-19 (Table 1), 291 (28%) lived in the zip code immediately surrounding the site, and 814 (79%) lived in San Francisco (Figure 1).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Map of those who completed the survey. Map tiles by Stamen Design, under CC BY 3.0. Data by OpenStreetMap, under CC BY SA.

Vaccine motivation among parents (defined as “definitely” or “probably” intending to vaccinate their child) was 90% (312/348), 91% (461/506), 93% (348/375), and 97% (197/203) for parents with children aged 0-4, 5-11, 12-15, and 16-17, respectively (Figure 2). Among vaccine-motivated parents with children aged 12-15 and 16-17, 65% (220/336) and 83% (158/190), respectively indicated that they would seek an approved vaccine for their child “as soon as they could”. The proportion of parents motivated to seek immediate vaccination for their children was lower for parents with younger children; 47% (144/304) of vaccine-motivated parents with children aged 0-4 and 53% (237/446) of parents with children aged 5-11 (Figure 3). Overall, 92% (949/1,033) of parents of children of all ages were vaccine-motivated, and 58% (546/949) indicated that they would vaccinate their children as soon as possible. Motivations for vaccine-seeking parents included keeping their child safe (92%, 874/949) protecting the community (66%, 629/949) protecting the adults in their family (64%, 605/949), and vaccination potentially being required for school or childcare (61%, 583/949).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Vaccine interest among parents with children in each age group (16-17, 12-15, 5-11, and 0-4 years)

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Intended speed of vaccine uptake for children among vaccine motivated parents

Among vaccine-hesitant parents, concerns included immediate side effects (60%, 55/91), long-term effects (41%, 37/91), fear of the vaccine affecting the child’s fertility (19%, 17/91), and belief that the child is not at risk for severe disease (8%, 7/91). Vaccine-hesitant parents had lower amounts of trust in all information sources than vaccine-motivated respondents, although 80% of them indicated a “great” or “good” deal of trust for their children’s doctors and 50% indicated trust for community-based groups (Table 2).

Vaccine acceptance was similar among Latinx (92%, 723/788) and non-Latinx (92%, 226/245) parents, and among men (93%, 457/492) and women (91%, 485/534). In multivariate analysis, having children in younger age groups (child age 12-15 aOR: 2.41, 95%CI:1.01-5.74; age 5-11 aOR: 2.97, 95%CI:1.29-6.85; age 0-4 aOR: 3.43, 95%CI:1.46-8.09; ref. child age 16-17) was associated with increased hesitancy. Female gender (aOR: 1.28, 95%CI:0.90-1.83) and non-Latinx ethnicity (aOR: 1.15, 95%CI:0.76-1.74) were not significantly associated with parental vaccine hesitancy in this population. Open text comments expressed concern for short and longer term side effects, including impacts on fertility (Table 3).

Discussion

Among a population of predominantly Latinx parents attending a community-based testing/vaccination site in a neighborhood highly impacted by COVID-19, over 90% of parents were probable or likely to vaccinate their children. Parents were motivated to protect their children and the community. Primary concerns focused on safety and fertility, and acceptance was lower for younger children. Trusted sources of information included medical providers and community groups.

Hesitancy of U.S. Latino parents to vaccinate their children ranges from 26-47% in surveys conducted via phone, Facebook, and online.^11–13 We were specifically interested in understanding attitudes of Latinx parents highly affected by the pandemic, many of whom were monolingual and do not have a primary care provider. It is difficult to directly compare findings of these reports to our results because they differ in their intent, sampling approaches, and survey methods. In this setting of a community-based testing/vaccination site, building on long-term community engagement and established trust, we found both Latinx and non-Latinx parents were highly motivated to vaccinate their children, expressing low rates of vaccine hesitancy overall (8%).

Parental concerns included short and long-term side effects, including potential fertility effects, similar to previous reports.¹¹ Parents of younger children were more likely to be vaccine hesitant; the lack of data on vaccine effectiveness and safety in younger children likely contributed. Responding effectively to parental concerns will require acknowledging their grounding in historical experience, including the sterilization of Latina women without consent during the 1970s¹⁴ and more recently, allegations of forced hysterectomies at U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement detention centers.¹⁵ Understanding and leveraging trusted sources of information will be crucial as new vaccine safety reports become available, such as those reporting myocarditis in youth.^16,17

Both pediatricians and community-based organizations were trusted sources of information, including among vaccine hesitant parents. Many clients at our community sites report having no primary physician.^3,18 For these reasons, bilingual physicians and health providers are present at our community vaccination site, and we provide health system registration. Our community partner (Unidos en Salud) organization’s staff receive regular updates on COVID vaccines, reviewing questions asked by participants at the site and concerns brought up by those in the neighborhood.

Optimizing vaccine uptake among children, as for adults, should include multiple options. Data from other surveys conducted among clients attending the same low-barrier vaccine site preferred this neighborhood site over schools for vaccination of their children.^3,18 Our community vaccination site offered onsite registration (eliminating needs for parental computer literacy), bilingual staff (overcome language barriers), weekend and weekday options for single and working parents, and a culturally sensitive and community-facing approach with key input from community leaders and stakeholders. These preferences emphasize how low-barrier vaccine site options are important additions to established healthcare settings, school-based and mobile vaccination options.

After the completion of our survey, on May 16, we began offering vaccinations to youth age 12-15 years with the EUA-granted Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Among the 320 youth vaccinated as of June 4 (73% Latinx), 74% were from a household who either had been tested or vaccinated at our site. Investment in neighborhood based, low-barrier sites provided the opportunity for families to seek information and vaccination services locally for their children at a location that had garnered their trust.

Our study was subject to limitations. First, the survey was intentionally conducted among parents the vast majority of whom had themselves received a vaccine. Findings reported should thus not be extrapolated to the general population, but rather illustrate the potential to leverage community-based sites to effectively reach children in highly impacted areas for vaccination. Second, both scientific context and community attitudes can evolve rapidly. Rather than providing a single answer expected to remain static over time and place, the current study illustrates the potential to leverage community vaccination sites to rapidly generate actionable and locally and culturally relevant context-specific knowledge. Finally, we did not include surveys of the youth themselves, who have an important perspective that may influence vaccine uptake.¹⁹

In conclusion, Latinx parents disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and utilizing a neighborhood testing/vaccination site were highly motivated to vaccinate their children to protect their health and that of the community.

Author Disclosure Statement(s)

None of the authors have reported competing financial interests.