Abstract
This study examined the associations between green spaces and one-years’ worth of SARS-CoV- 2 infection rates across all 3,108 counties in the contiguous United States after controlling for multiple categories of confounding factors. We found green spaces at the county level have a significant negative association with infection rates. Among all types of green spaces, forest yields the most consistent and strongest negative association. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the negative association of forest across five urbanicity levels, and the strength of the association increases as disease incidence increases across five time periods. Although forest located in moderately urbanized counties yields the strongest association, the negative pattern of significant associations holds across all five urbanicity levels. A population-weighted analysis revealed that proximity to forest within a moderate walking distance (≤ 1.0–1.4 km) may provide the greatest protection against the risk of infection.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The work of all researchers from the University of Hong Kong (HKU) described in this paper was supported by Seed Funding for Strategic Interdisciplinary Research Scheme approved by The University Research Committee (URC) of HKU (Project code:102010054.088616.01100.302.01). The work of all researchers from the City University of Hong Kong described in this paper was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR (Project No. CityU11207520).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
We used publicly available data only.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
1. landcover data of developed open space, forest, shrub/scrub, grassland/herbaceous, hay/pasture, and cultivated crops are extracted from National Land Cover Datasets in 2016. 2. Population-weighted forest exposure data is extracted from National Land Cover Datasets in 2016. 3. Local parks data is extracted from the Esri USA Parks dataset. 4. Tree canopy data is extracted from Tree Canopy Cover Datasets of the United States Forest Service (USFS). 5. NDVI data is extracted from NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, which was calculated on Google Earth Engine. 6. SARS-CoV-2 Infection data is extracted from a dataset of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 7. Socioeconomic and demographic data is extracted from a dataset of the US Census Bureau. 8. Healthcare and testing data is extracted from the CDC dataset. 9. Pre-existing chronic disease data is extracted from the CDC dataset. 10. Policy and regulation data is extracted from GitHub, CDC dataset, The National Governors Association dataset. 11. Behavioral factor data is extracted from the dataset of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) (County Health Rankings and Roadmaps) 12. Environmental factors data is extracted from the dataset of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), US Census Bureau, and USGS National, Transportation Dataset (NTD) Airports, etc.
https://www.mrlc.gov/data/nlcd-2016-land-cover-conus
https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=578968f975774d3fab79fe56c8c90941
https://www.mrlc.gov/data/type/tree-canopy
https://usafacts.org/visualizations/coronavirus-covid-19-spread-map/
https://nccd.cdc.gov/DHDSPAtlas/Default.aspx
https://github.com/tonmcg/US_County_Level_Election_Results_08-20
https://www.nga.org/governors/
https://ephtracking.cdc.gov/DataExplorer/
https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/app/arizona/2020/measure/factors/9/data
