Prevalence and correlates of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among people who inject drugs in the San Diego-Tijuana border region

Introduction

The disproportionate burden of COVID-19 on under-represented minorities is well documented [1–3]. However, data are lacking on people with substance use disorders who may be vulnerable to acquiring and transmitting SARS-CoV-2 due to their living conditions (e.g., homelessness, incarceration) and drug-related behaviors (e.g. smoking, vaping, sharing drug paraphernalia, sex work) [4,5]. In a nation-wide study, those with substance use disorders, especially African Americans and opioid users, were at increased risk of COVID-19 [6]. However, this study could not determine whether these factors were independently associated with COVID-19 diagnosis since risk factor data were not available, and the sample was restricted to patients accessing health care. In a telephone survey of active and former drug injectors in Baltimore, Maryland, compared to former substance users, those who were actively using substances were less likely to report social distancing [5]. There is also evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has interrupted drug supplies as well as harm reduction and addiction treatment services [7].

Most epidemiologic research on COVID-19 has been conducted on inpatient samples and has focused on upper-income countries. We studied prevalence and correlates of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a binational community-based study of people who inject drugs residing in San Diego, California and Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico. We hypothesized a priori that residents of San Diego who had recently crossed the border to inject drugs in Tijuana and those who were homeless, traded sex or injected drugs more often would be more likely to test SARS-CoV-2 seropositive.

Materials and methods

Results

Of 405 participants tested, none had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Considering serologic evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 19 (4.7%) tested indeterminate and were excluded. Detectable SARS-CoV-2 IgG and/or IgM antibodies were observed in 36.3% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 31.5%-41.1%], of whom the majority had IgM (92.1%). Of the 140 testing SARS-CoV-2 seropositive, only 37.5% had previously been tested, and 26.8% reported ≥1 current symptom consistent with COVID-19. There was no significant trend in seroprevalence over time (p=0.80).

Of the 386 subjects included in the analysis, 63.5% lived in San Diego County. Most were male (74.1%) and Hispanic/Latinx/Mexican (71.5%). Median age was 43 (inter-quartile range [IQR: 35-51]. Over half reported that COVID-19 had adversely affected their housing or income. During the last six months, 39.1% were homeless, 8.3% were incarcerated and 12.4% traded sex (Table 1). Of the San Diego residents, 50.8% reported having crossed the border to inject drugs in Tijuana within the last six months. Older age and identifying as Hispanic, Latinx, or Mexican were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (Table 1). Considering potential community exposures in the past six months (Table 2), those engaging in sex work were significantly more likely to test seropositive compared to those who did not (17.9% vs. 9.3%, p=0.01, [Relative Risk (RR): 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.09]. Being incarcerated was associated with marginally higher SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (RR: 1.43; 95% CI: 0.99-2.09). We did not observe injection drug use, smoking, vaping specific drugs or any other substance use behaviors to be associated with seroprevalence, nor were any co-morbidities (i.e., HIV, HCV, Type 2 diabetes, hypertension).

In a multivariate model that controlled for sex (Table 3), each year in age was associated with a 2% increase in SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (Adjusted relative risk (AdjRR): 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03). Identifying as Hispanic/Latinx/Mexican was also independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (AdjRR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.09-2.15), as was engaging in sex work in the past six months (adjRR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.18-2.27). Being incarcerated in the last six months remained marginally significant (AdjRR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.97-2.27). When country of residence was forced into the model, all significant associations held except ethnicity. Excluding nine participants who reported having received at least one COVID-19 vaccine did not appreciably change parameter estimates.

Although 89.5% reported engaging in ≥1 protective behavior [e.g., face masks (73.5%)], only 46.5% reported social distancing, 22.8% increased handwashing/hand sanitizers, and 9.0% reported avoiding sharing drug paraphernalia in the prior six months (Table 1). None of these behaviors were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 serostatus. Those testing SARS-CoV-2 seropositive were more likely to report having stopped smoking in the last six months and to have had a COVID-19 test.

Compared to non-sex workers, sex workers were just as less likely report protective behaviors but were significantly more likely to report being exposed to someone with COVID-19 (20% vs. 3.8%, p=0.001) or to have low/very low food security (94.3% vs. 77.9% p=0.02).

Discussion

In this community-based study of people who inject drugs in the San Diego-Tijuana border region, over one third had detectable SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which exceeds estimates from the general population in either city. Modeling of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in San Diego County suggests that prevalence was below 5% through July, 2020 then increased to approximately 20% by January, 2021 (California Department of Public Health, unpublished data). In a household study conducted in Tijuana in February 2021, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was 21% [11]. Reports in the literature of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence among people who inject drugs are sparse. In a study of needle exchange clients in Stockholm, Sweden, SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was 5.4% [12], whereas in a survey of people who inject drugs in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 11% reported that they had tested positive for COVID-19 [13]. U.S. estimates among people who are homeless or living in shelters range from 2%-14% [14–16].

In our study, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence did not differ by country of residence, perhaps reflecting close social ties between San Diego and Tijuana communities despite the closure of the U.S.-Mexico border. In a phylogenetic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences from the U.S. and Mexico, those obtained from the Mexican state of Baja California were more closely related to San Diego than to Mexico City.[17] Although one half of the San Diego residents in our study had crossed the border and injected drugs in Tijuana in the last six months, we found no evidence that cross-border mobility was associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.

Consistent with other studies, subjects who were older [6] and who identified as Hispanic, Latinx, or Mexican [2] were significantly more likely to test SARS-CoV-2 seropositive. This demonstrates that even among the lowest socioeconomic strata in the US and Mexico, ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence persist.

We did not observe substance use behaviors, such as smoking, vaping, or use of specific drugs such as opiates or stimulants to be associated with an elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as others have hypothesized [4,6]. Instead, we observed that circumstances in the risk environment, notably sex work and incarceration, were associated with significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence.

To our knowledge, ours is the first study to show that sex work is independently associated with higher SARS-CoV-2 prevalence after controlling for potential confounders such as sex, age, and ethnicity. In an unpublished study in Denmark, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was higher among sex workers (12.2%) than people experiencing homelessness (6.8%) or the general population (2.9%) [18], but the independent effects of these and other factors were not assessed.

Although the majority of our sample reported that COVID-19 had greatly affected their income and housing, sex workers may have faced additional hardships following the closure of the U.S.-Mexico border because of their reliance on sex tourism, and since social distancing is not possible during sexual transactions. Compared to the rest of the sample, significantly higher proportions of sex workers reported low or very low food insecurity, and they were more likely to report having been exposed to someone with COVID-19 than others. This suggests that sex workers may have engaged in higher risk behaviors to support themselves, placing them at greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a study of female sex workers in Kenya, sexual transactions declined during the pandemic [19] and those most reliant on sex work reported greater food insecurity, which is consistent with our findings. Among female sex workers in Nigeria, those with knowledge about COVID-19 were significantly more likely to wear face masks, but less than half did so [20].

Despite concerns about sex workers’ vulnerability to COVID-19, few countries provide them aid [19,21]. In Thailand, the Netherlands and Japan, sex workers were included in COVID-19 government-sponsored support programs [21], but they are excluded in countries where sex work is criminalized, such as the U.S. Although sex work is quasi-legal in Tijuana’s red light district, those using drugs are less likely to obtain sex work permits and instead work outside of commercial establishments that could offer protections [22]. In an earlier study, we found that female sex workers in Tijuana who inject drugs were more vulnerable to offers of unprotected sex in exchange for more money or drugs compared to those that did not inject [23].

Our finding that recent incarceration was independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity could reflect institutional exposures. Over-crowding was implicated in COVID-19 outbreaks in California correctional institutions [24], including those in the U.S.-Mexico border region. Mitigation included early release, halting intakes, and eliminating bail, but a recent analysis suggests that considerable potential for SARS-CoV-2 exposures persist, at least in the California prison system [24]. Similar measures have not been undertaken in Baja California.

Our study also found that over half of those testing SARS-CoV-2 seropositive had not been tested prior to study enrolment. These findings underscore the need to improve community outreach to provide testing, vaccines, and treatment, for example using mobile syringe exchange programs.

Limitations

Our ability to detect some associations was limited due to statistical power. Ours was a non-random sample and the cross-sectional study design precludes drawing causal inferences. Participants experiencing symptoms may have changed behaviors, such as stopped smoking or sought COVID-19 testing.

Of note, none of the self-collected swabs tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The sensitivity of the pooling approach could have been impacted by: 1) the viral load of any particular infected individual; 2) the consistency with which swabs were obtained; 3) storage, shipping, and transport conditions; or 4) of diluting out (via pooling) any viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA collected below the limit of detection. In this study, we limited our pools to ≤10 swabs, and previously validated our approach with up to 30 samples per pool where the limit of detection was estimated at 2.4 copies/μL [25]. Therefore, it is unlikely that we experienced loss of sensitivity due to pooling.

Since SARS-CoV-2 antibodies may wane over time especially among patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic [26-27], infections that occurred earlier in the epidemic may have gone undetected. However, the majority of participants testing SARS-CoV-2 seropositive had detectable IgM antibody titers, which is suggestive of recent infection [28]. Some misclassification could have occurred among those testing indeterminate who were recently infected, but these were few in number and would have tended to underestimate SARS-CoV-2 prevalence, dampening any observed associations.

Since COVID-19 vaccines did not become available to adults 18-65 years of age in San Diego County until May 15, 2021 and were not available to most adults in Tijuana until after the study period ended, we were unable to examine the impact of vaccination on SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nevertheless, among the 75 San Diego residents in our sample who were interviewed after May 15, only 9 (9.3%) reported having received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. In comparison, the proportion of adults aged ≥18 years who had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose in San Diego County through June 24, 2021 exceeded 50% [29].

Conclusions

We found that most people who inject drugs in the San Diego-Tijuana border region engaged in preventive measures to avoid SARS-CoV-2, but since over one-third had evidence of infection, a binational policy response is warranted beyond the closure of the U.S.-Mexico border. The proportion of participants who had previously been tested for SARS-CoV-2 or had received COVID-19 vaccine was very low. Efforts are needed to mitigate risks and provide COVID-19 vaccines to older and Hispanic people who inject drugs, especially those with less agency to protect themselves, such as those who are sex workers or incarcerated.