Abstract
Pain, a protective mechanism turns into a pathologic response when it becomes chronic. Recent evidences are pointing towards neuroplastic brain changes as the primary factor for the persisting pain in chronic nonspecific low back pain (cLBP). To summarise the previous fMRI studies, a coordinate-based ALE meta-analysis of resting functional brain imaging studies is carried out to identify the clusters activated in the brain in cLBP.
Literature survey: ‘PubMed’, ‘Scopus’ and ‘Sleuth’ were searched for studies with resting functional whole-brain imaging in cLBP. Till October 2020; 258, 238, and 7 studies were found respectively after search. The activity pattern was documented in ‘without stimulation’ and ‘with stimulation’ groups. The risk of bias was assessed by Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-section studies. Total seven (224 cLBP patients, 110 activation foci) and six studies (106 cLBP patients, 66 activation foci) were selected among 277 studies for metanalysis in the ‘without stimulation’ and ‘with stimulation’ group respectively. In the ‘without stimulation’ group 8 statistically significant clusters were found. The clusters are distributed in the prefrontal cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, and primary motor cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, putamen, claustrum, amygdala, and associated white matters in both hemispheres. On the other group, 3 statistically significant clusters were found in the frontal cortex, Parietal cortex, and Insula. In the ‘with stimulation’ group, significant lateralization was observed and most of the clusters were in the right hemisphere. The white matter involvement was more in the ‘with stimulation’ group (78.62% Vs 38.21%). The statistically significant clusters found in this study indicate a probable imbalance in GABAergic modulation of brain circuit and dysfunction in descending pain modulation system. This disparity in pain neuro-matrix is the source of spontaneous and persisting pain in cLBP.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
The protocol of this review is registered in PROSPERO (registration number : CRD42020203007)
Funding Statement
no external funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
IRB approval eas not required for systematic review.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data of meta-analysis is available in the public domain in the respective articles . GingerALE 3.0.2 was used for ALE meta-analysis and Mango (4.1) by Research Imaging Institute, UTHSCSA was used for visualization of the data.
