Abstract
Aim The increase in ectopic pregnancies (EP) in recent years and their impact on female fertility forces physicians to find an effective medical treatment that can avoid surgery as soon as possible. Methotrexate and mifepristone are widely used in conservative treatments, but the effectiveness of this combination is not completely clear. Therefore, the aims in this meta-analysis are to systematically analyze the efficacy of mifepristone combined with methotrexate in the treatment of EP through existing studies and draw a conclusion, to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of inclusion trials and propose improvement measures and scientific designing schemes.
Methods Six databases will be searched, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database (WF). Randomized controlled trials published up to October 2020 will be selected. Search terms include mifepristone, methotrexate, EP, and random (free word/synonym expansion). We will include trials in which the experimental group was treated with combination of mifepristone and methotrexate, and the control group was treated with mifepristone alone. Revman 5.4 will be used to evaluate the quality of the trials, and the effect model will be selected to analyze the results. Cure rate will be the main outcome index.
Result Only when we finish this meta analysis can we get the result.
Discussion The results of this study will provide evidence for the efficacy of mifepristone combined with methotrexate therapy in the treatment of EP. The site of onset of pregnancy should be taken into account.
PROSPERO registration number CRD42021246757
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
A Systematic Review Protocol is not applicable
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Manuscript title updated;Section on discussion added
Data Availability
The authors declare that all data from this study are available.
Abbreviations
- CI
- confidence Interval
- OR
- odds ratio
- RCTs
- randomized controlled trials
- EP
- ectopic pregnancy
