Abstract
Reluctant eye contact and reduced social interactions characteristic of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are consistent with deficits in oculomotor and face processing systems. We test the hypothesis that these deficits are interrelated ASD.
Eye-tracking and hyperscanning with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) were used to acquire neuroimaging data during live, dynamic eye-to-eye contacts in 17 ASD and 19 typically-developed (TD) adults. Real eye contact conditions were contrasted with conditions where eye gaze was directed at a comparable dynamic face video. These findings were regressed with eye-contact dwell-time, i.e., times when gaze of both partners was in the eye-box of the other, to confirm the relationship between visual sensing and neural coding. Visual fixations and positional variance were also determined.
Average gaze dwell-times in the “eye-box” did not vary between ASD and TD participants but were longer for the Real Eye than Video Eye condition for both groups. However, positional gaze variability, “jitter”, was higher for ASD in both conditions. Neural findings for TD [Real Eye > Video Eye] were consistent with previous findings for interactive face-gaze with activity in right temporal and dorsal parietal regions. However, in ASD ventral temporal regions were observed for this contrast without evidence for dorsal parietal activity. This neural difference was enhanced when regressed by eye-contact dwell-times.
Together findings are consistent with the hypothesis that unstable bottom-up oculomotor signals contribute to deficits in live face processing and reduced dorsal stream activity in ASD.
Significance Eye contact avoidance is a diagnostic feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. Using a two-person neural imaging system and a face-to-face paradigm with eye tracking, we found that the neural systems activated by live eye contact differed between typically developed (TD) and ASD groups. In ASD, the ventral occipital parietal systems were engaged, whereas in TD, the dorsal posterior parietal systems were engaged. Positional variation of eye gaze, “jitter”, was higher in ASD than TD. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that bottom-up variations in visual sensing are components of altered interactive face processing and dorsal stream mechanisms and may contribute to the neural underpinnings of reluctant eye contact behaviors in ASD.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was partially supported by the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers 1R01MH111629 (PIs JH and JCM); R01MH107513 (PI JH); 1R01MH119430 (PI JH); U19MH108206 (PI JCM); R01 MH107426 (PI JCM); R01 MH100173 (PI JCM); NIH Medical Scientist Training Program Training Grant T32GM007205 (SD); NRSA 1F30MH116626 (PI SD). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. All data reported in this paper are available upon request from the corresponding and first author. The authors are grateful to the participants for their essential efforts to advance understanding of ASD; to our two confederates, CD and IS, for consistent partnership with our participants and the investigators; and to Jen Cuzzocreo for data-base management and graphical representations of the data.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Yale Human Research Protection Program
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Extended information about authors and contributions are included after main text
Data Availability
The datasets analyzed for this study will be made available upon request at fmri.org/ ENDAR and the NIH Data Archive.
