Abstract
Background Understanding how and under what circumstances a highly effective psychological intervention, improved symptoms of depression is important to bring this evidence-informed intervention to scale, particularly in resource-poor settings. We aim to estimate the indirect effects of potentially important mediators to improve symptoms of depression in the Healthy Activity Program (HAP) trial.
Methods Interventional in(direct) effects were used to simultaneously decompose the total effect of the intervention on depression symptoms measured through the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The following indirect effects were considered: characteristics of sessions including the number of sessions and homework completed; behavioural activation according to an adapted version of the Behavioural Activation for Depression Short Form (BADS-SF), and extra sessions offered to participants who did not respond to the intervention.
Results Of the total effect of the intervention measured through the difference in PHQ-9 scores between treatment arms (mean difference: -2.2, 95% bias-corrected CI: -3.2, -0.8), 45% was mediated through improved levels of behavioural activation (−1.0, -1.3, -0.6). There was no evidence to support the mediating role of characteristics of the sessions nor the extra sessions offered to participants who did not respond to the treatment.
Conclusions Findings from our robust mediation analyses, confirmed the importance of behavioural activation in improving depression symptoms. Contrary to published literature, our findings suggest that neither the number of sessions nor proportion of homework completed, improved outcomes. Moreover, results indicate that the extra sessions were insufficient to improve symptoms of depression for participants who did not respond to the intervention.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
no funding was received
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The trial protocol received ethical approval from the Sangath and LSHTM Institutional Review Boards.(Patel et al., 2014) Written or witnessed verbal (if the participant is illiterate) informed consent was mandatory for enrolment.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
data not publicaly available
Abbreviations
- LIMCs
- Low- and middle-income countries
- WHO
- World Health Organization
- mhGAP
- WHO’s Mental Health Gap Action Programme
- HAP
- The Healthy Activity Programme
- BADS-SF
- Behavioural Activation for Depression Score
- PHQ-9
- Patient Health Questionnaire 9
- (EUC)
- Enhanced usual care
- (BDI-II)
- Becks Inventory for Depression version II
