Abstract
Objective To systematically assess Germany’s nutrition policies, to benchmark them against international best practices, and to identify priority policy actions to improve population-level nutrition in Germany.
Design We applied the Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), a methodological framework developed by the INFORMAS network. Qualitative content analysis of laws, directives and other documents formed the basis of a multi-staged, structured consultation process.
Setting Germany.
Participants The expert consultation process included 55 experts from academia, public administration, and civil society.
Results Germany lags behind international best practices in several key policy areas. For 18 policy indicators, the degree of implementation compared to international best practices was rated as very low, for 21 as low, for 8 as intermediate, and for none as high. In particular, indicators on food taxation, regulation of food marketing, and retail and food service sector policies were rated as very low to low. Identified priority actions included the binding implementation of nutrition standards for schools and kindergartens, a reform of the value added tax on foods and beverages, a sugar-sweetened beverage tax and stricter regulation of food marketing directed at children.
Conclusions The results show that Germany makes insufficient use of the potential of evidence-informed health-promoting nutrition policies. Adopting international best practices in key policy areas could help to reduce the burden of nutrition-related chronic disease and related inequalities in nutrition and health in Germany. Implementation of relevant policies requires political leadership, a broad societal dialogue, and evidence-informed advocacy by civil society, including the scientific community.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
his work was funded by a grant from Germany's Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) as part of Joint Programming Initiative "A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life" (JPI HDHL) (Grant number 01EA1818I). The funder had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethics committee the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Muenchen (LMU Munich) waived ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Financial support: This work was funded by a grant from Germany’s Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) as part of Joint Programming Initiative “A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life” (JPI HDHL) (Grant number 01EA1818I). The funder had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.
Conflicts of interest: None
Authorship: PvP conceived the idea for the paper and led the research. PvP and KG developed the methodology, collected and analysed the data, interpreted the results and wrote the first draft. CK contributed to data collection, analysis, interpretation of results and manuscript preparation. AH, JS and ER contributed to the development of the methodolgy, interpretation of results and manuscript preparation.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
