Measuring College Students’ with Disabilities Attitudes Toward Taking COVID-19 Vaccines

How Do College Students with Disabilities Feel About Taking COVID-19 Vaccines?

After March 11th, 2020, when the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 (coronavirus) a global pandemic (World Health Organization, 2020), colleges and universities briskly moved students, faculty, and staff online in an abundance of safety and caution. This move to online learning was particularly burdensome, both in terms of human and financial capital, for institutions with large on-campus populations. Moving students online also removed them from residence halls and student affairs related activities on campus, many of which employ thousands of higher education professionals across the United States and the world (Hubler, 2020). Additionally, on campus activities, such as becoming involved in student organizations and socializing with classmates in true in person settings have been proven to increase retention and graduation rates, compounding the difficulty of a shift to online learning (Bawa, 2016). Perhaps more so than any other student population, students with disabilities may have been most marginalized by this rapid move online, as students with disabilities often reported that institutions and their practitioners were not ready to support them in online spaces and many disability services struggled to deliver services in a timely manner (AHEAD, 2021).

Given the many hurdles presented by COVID-19, many institutions of higher education are exploring how to reopen their doors in subsequent semesters. Reopening would not only bring students back to campus but also bring faculty and staff back to campus and re-employ thousands of laid off or furloughed workers across the United States and the World (Hubler, 2020). However, no research has explored how students with disabilities view COVID-19 vaccines and whether these students feel safe taking a vaccine that may negatively interact with any one of their disabilities. As has been well-documented across dozens of news outlets, the development of a viable, safe, and effective COVID-19 vaccine became a reality in early 2021, as both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines cleared emergency authorization and were available to certain populations (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021). The public availability of vaccines in early 2021 was often limited to high-risk populations including those who are 65 and older or those who were essential workers working in healthcare, such as hospital and clinic workers (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021). Furthermore, there is an emerging debate as to whether colleges and universities can mandate vaccines, especially for at-risk populations such as students with disabilities (Gostin et al., 2021) or students with Constitutional grounds for vaccine waivers through claims to religious freedom (Reiss & DiPaolo, 2021).. Yet, little data has emerged that has focused on how COVID-19 vaccines affect people with disabilities differently than people without disabilities and whether these people feel comfortable taking COVID-19 vaccines as part of plans to physically return to postsecondary campuses.

As a result, as COVID-19 vaccines becomes more widely available, colleges and universities, especially those with robust on campus living facilities and residence halls, maybe face difficult questions as they relate to college students with disabilities:

1. How comfortable do college students with disabilities feel taking a COVID-19 vaccine?

2. Would college students with disabilities take a COVID-19 if it were required by their institution to return to campus?

3. Mid-semester, would students with disabilities withdraw from classes if their institution required a COVID-19 vaccine to stay on campus?

These are the questions that this brief answers through a survey of 237 currently-enrolled postsecondary students in the United States at all three levels: two-year students, four-year students, and graduate students. Results suggest many students with disabilities are willing to take a COVID-19 vaccine if their institution required it to return to on-campus learning, however some students may be wary of returning to campus without a vaccine only to be told mid-semester that a vaccine is required to stay on-campus. The research team will close the study by addressing implications for policy, research, and practice surrounding COVID-19 vaccinations and the health and safety of college students with disabilities.

Methods

Results

Descriptive statistics of survey responses can be found in Table 2 below:

Overall, 30.4% of students with disabilities felt “extremely comfortable” taking a COVID-19 vaccine, while at least 25% of these students expressed at least slight discomfort in taking a vaccine. Additionally, over 75% of students with disabilities would take a COVID-19 vaccine if they needed one to physically return to campus in Fall 2021. Finally, 66.2% of students with disabilities reported that they would withdraw from classes mid-semester if their institution suddenly required a COVID-19 vaccine to stay on campus. Results from the latter two questions were surprising, as over 75% of respondents reported being willing to take a required vaccine to return to campus, yet 66.2% of respondents reported that they would withdraw if this vaccine requirement occurred mid-semester. Here, future research may be needed into how students with disabilities perceive vaccine mandates and whether the stress of seeking and receiving a vaccine may outweigh the educational benefits of on-campus learning and interaction.

Regression analyses predicting college students’ with disabilities levels of comfort with COVID-19 vaccines (OLS regression; Model 1), attitudes towards vaccine mandates to return to campus (logistic regression; Model 2), and likelihood of withdrawing mid-semester if an institution mandates COVID-19 vaccines (logistic regression; Model 3) can be found in Table 3 below:

Results in Table 3 and Model 1 suggest Latinx students with disabilities felt more comfortable with taking a COVID-19 vaccine (p < 0.05) when compared to students from different racial and ethnic backgrounds, controlling for other demographic characteristics. Similarly, non-binary identifying students (p < 0.05), first generation students (p < 0.00), community college students (p < 0.01), and graduate students (p < 0.00) felt more comfortable taking COVID-19 vaccines than their counterparts after controlling for other demographic characteristics. Attendance status (hybrid or in-person) and course load (full versus part time) was not predictive of COVID-19 vaccine comfort.

Results of the logistic regression in Model 2 suggest Black or African American students (p < 0.05), Latinx students (ideal model fit), women students (p < 0.05), and students attending courses in-person (p < 0.05) were more likely to take a COVID-19 vaccine to attend courses in-person/on-campus. Other demographic characteristics were not predictive of a students’ with a disabilities willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine to return to in-person, on-campus learning. Moreover, results of the logistic regression in Model 3 suggest women students (p < 0.05) and graduate students (p < 0.05) are not as likely to withdraw mid-semester if their institution required COVID-19 vaccination, whereas older students (p < 0.05) and first generation students (p < 0.01) are more likely to withdraw mid-semester if their institution required COVID-19 vaccination compared to counterparts after controlling for other demographic characteristics. Collectively, these results suggest diverse attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccine mandates held by students with disabilities from a variety of intersectional identities.

Discussion and Implications for Student Affairs Leadership and Campus Policy

Central to the conversation about universities’ Fall 2021 and beyond opening plans has focused on vaccine distribution and whether institutions felt it necessary to mandate COVID-19 vaccines to return to on-campus learning. However, data in this study suggest that students with disabilities who hold certain intersectional identities may not feel comfortable taking a COVID-19 vaccine for real, potentially life-threatening reasons given how COVID-19 vaccines may produce adverse effects or interactions with disability-related medications. For example, many students with disabilities may feel comfortable taking a COVID-19 vaccine to return to campus (∼75% of respondents, Table 2), yet many students indicated that they may withdraw from campus mid-semester if their institution mandated vaccines mid-semester (∼66% of respondents, Table 2). Here, institutions must understand that students with disabilities may require either extra time to receive a vaccine or may not feel comfortable recovering from a COVID-19 vaccine mid-semester when they are on-campus and potentially away from their family and primary medical provider. As a result, the timing of vaccine mandates may be key to fostering a sense of comfort and willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine by students with disabilities. Furthermore, if there is a change of vaccine mandates mid-semester, universities should consider offering online learning for students with disabilities who are not comfortable taking the vaccine right away, so they do not have to withdraw from their classes.

Moreover, regression analyses in Table 3 suggest that certain students with disabilities may hold intersectional identities that could influence their vaccine comfort, their willingness to take a mandated vaccine, and their willingness to take a vaccine mid-semester when they are on-campus and potentially away from their support systems. Notably, women with disabilities expressed a strong willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine to return to campus, whether that mandate was made prior to the semester or mid-semester. However, first generation students with disabilities expressed a willingness to take a COVID-19 prior to the semester but not mid-semester. These attitudes may be attributed to a variety of factors related to their intersectional identities and the hurdles they may face in procuring appropriate medical care while on-campus and away from home. From here, institutional leaders and student affairs professionals must be cognizant of the potentially minoritizing effect of COVID-19 vaccination policies as sections of plans to return to on-campus learning--these mandates may influence more first-generation students with disabilities off-campus, which would continue to perpetuate a cycle of discrimination that these students have already faced in non-pandemic times.

Ultimately, many institutional communications have focused on the necessity for vaccines to be widely available and accessible to the staff, students, and faculty that make up university communities. While COVID-19 variants and community surges are to be expected in the foreseeable future, the progress of vaccines and the potential to inoculate entire student bodies and personnel presents promise. However, vaccine shortages, modes of delivery, and individual willingness to become vaccinated remain an ongoing hurdle for higher education officials. What is not reported on, however, is how students with disabilities feel toward COVID-19 vaccination mandates. Particularly, that these vaccination mandates may not be safe for them while they are away from home and their primary care, or these mandates may not be safe given the type and intersectional nature of a student’s disability.

Ultimately, it is critical for postsecondary institutions to communicate COVID-19 vaccination mandates clearly and concisely to all students, especially students with disabilities, in a timely manner, to ensure that vaccine procedures are safe and can be conducted in ways that do not further marginalize this population. If colleges and universities across the United States want to safely open campuses in Fall 2021 and beyond, vaccine mandates should be carefully considered and implemented, as taking a vaccine for any purpose may indeed be a life-or-death decision for a college student with a disability.