Abstract
Purpose This study assessed the perspectives of pregnant and post-partum African immigrant women on mental illness.
Methods We conducted a focus group session (N=14) among pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women in June 2020. We used an inductive driven thematic analysis to identify themes related to mental health stigma.
Results Five core themes emerged: conceptualization of mental health, community stigmatizing attitudes, biopsychosocial stressors, management of mental health and methods to reduce stigma.
Conclusion Understanding the perspectives of pregnant African immigrant women at the intersection of their race, ethnicity, gender and migration is necessary to improve engagement with mental health services.
Introduction
The African immigrant population increased by nearly 90% since 2000, yet they remain underrepresented in health care research (1, 2). Pregnant and postpartum African immigrant women experience their mental health in pregnancy at the intersection of their race, ethnicity, gender and migrant status. This period is a vulnerable time that leaves mothers highly susceptible to psychiatric disorders (3, 4).
In the US, 13-19% of women who give birth experience postpartum depression (3, 5). Despite the similarity in prevalence of postpartum depression among White, Black and Latina people, utilization of mental health services is lower among African immigrants (6, 7). Rates of depression treatment are particularly low among Black compared to White pregnant women (8). Moreover, migrant status affects health outcomes; for example, Canadian-born women experienced significantly different risk factors for postpartum depression compared to immigrant women (9). Data on mental health and associated stigma among pregnant and post-partum immigrant women in the US has focused more on Latina rather than Black immigrant women (10).
To address mental illness stigma and improve engagement in mental health services (11-14), dedicated studies are necessary in the peripartum and postpartum period for African immigrant women. We assessed the perspectives of pregnant and postpartum African immigrants on the conceptualization of their emotional health, views on mental health stigma and the underlying religious and cultural beliefs influencing mental health service use.
Methods
Ethical Consideration
The institutional review board at Northwestern University approved this study. Written and informed consent was completed.
Setting, Participants and Study Design
Setting
The study was completed in partnership with the United African Organization (UAO). UAO provided social services to African immigrants. The Northwestern University team included a psychiatrist and a research coordinator.
Participants
The focus group and survey participants (N=14) inclusion criteria were:1) identifying as an African immigrant, 2) pregnant or postpartum within the past 12 months, 3) English speaking, and 4) 18 years of age or older. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. We held one focus group and participants also completed a brief survey on perspectives on mental health.
Recruitment
Flyers and brochures were placed in the community organization offices. Community partners used text messages and word of mouth to publicize the study. Interested community members were self-referred.
Interview Procedure and Protocol
The semi-structured interview guide and survey components were developed by a multidisciplinary team including academic and community partners to ensure culturally acceptable language in discussing mental health. We developed the interview guide and survey based on the existing literature and knowledge gaps around perspectives on mental illness (8).
The questionnaire was completed prior to the focus group and all study activities lasted approximately 75 minutes. Due to the COVID 19 pandemic, the study activity was held online via videoconferencing. Participants received $30 compensation for their time. The focus group was facilitated by an experienced facilitator (a first generation African immigrant female), and notes were taken to aid reliability and validity. Probes and member checking were used to expand ideas and verify meaning expressed by participants (15). All participant’ information was de-identified to ensure confidentiality.
Data Analysis
The focus group questions are presented in Table 1. We used a grounded theory thematic approach (16, 17). NVivo software, a qualitative analysis tool, was used. The focus group was audio recorded and transcribed using Rev, an authenticated platform for transcription. We employed five iterative steps (16): initial review, line coding, organization of meaning units, discussion and final review of consistency between coders. Intercoder reliability (K > 0.80) was reached. Coders applied the codebook to the full transcript.
Focus group questions
Assessments
We developed a socio-demographic questionnaire to assess age group, education, marital status, citizenship status, income, employment status and insurance status. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) is a validated two-item depression screening measure (18). This measure has a high positive predictive value (18). We also developed a brief questionnaire to assess specific beliefs about mental illness such as beliefs that mental illness is caused by sin or a moral failure as well as views on medications (19). The main analysis in this study was conducted using a focus group interview guide, see table 1.
Results
Among the African immigrant women (n=14) in the study, 50.0% of respondents reported being pregnant (n=7; 5 in the first trimester) and three (21.4%) participants had a positive screen on the PHQ-2. Participants’ characteristics are shown in table 2.
Characteristics of sample
Participant characteristics
Core themes and representative quotes
Summary of focus group and brief questionnaire results
Five core themes related to mental health and mental health stigma emerged:
Theme 1. Conceptualization of mental health in the community. Some respondents described mental health as an emotional experience, possessing resilience and having good functional wellbeing. The word “mental” was seen as having negative connotations. Some respondents (n = 4, 28.57%) believe depression is not a medical illness, and some respondents (n = 3, 21.4%) reported people with depression are dangerous, while others (n =7, 50%) reported people with depression are unpredictable.
Theme 2. Community stigmatizing attitudes towards mental health challenges during pregnancy. Several respondents shared their experience of judgment. People with emotional struggles were seen as “crazy” or “mentally retarded.” There was majority consensus that pregnant women should not take medication while pregnant (n = 10, 71.4%). Some respondents reported feelings of sadness or depression are a moral failure (7 [50%]), a result of sin (6 [42.9%]) or caused by evil spirits (5 [35.6%]).
Theme 3. Biopsychosocial stressors and hormonal changes during the peripartum and post-partum period. There was general consensus that pregnancy was connected to changes in the emotional state of a person. Stressors included biological and psychosocial aspects of stress – hormones, lack of sleep, the overwhelming nature of personal and professional responsibilities.
Theme 4. Management of mental health during the perinatal and postpartum period. Respondents offered several ways to manage mental health in the context of pregnancy including self-motivation, religious resources and talking to others (both in the community and professionally). While 50.0% of respondents reported that they would call 911 or seek immediate help if someone was having suicidal thoughts, five (35.7%) said they would never or rarely seek immediate help.
Theme 5. Methods to reduce stigma. One respondent described mental health as invisible and difficult to “normalize.” Respondents suggested public health campaigns and awareness groups in the community, similar to the focus group forum. In particular, one respondent described the need to support pregnant women due to the added psychosocial stressors that come with pregnancy.
Discussion
Our main finding was that stigma towards mental health was associated with the label of being “crazy” or being judged. In addition, medication was not viewed as acceptable, but there was openness to activities such as support from the community and psychotherapy. There was acceptance of the biopsychosocial aspects of pregnancy (including hormonal changes); despite this acknowledgement, most respondents had stigmatizing views of medications. Majority of respondents (64.3%) reported they would rarely or never take prescription medications. And some respondents endorsed beliefs that sadness or depression is a moral failure, a sin or caused by evil spirits. Past studies show that stigmatizing beliefs similar to these led to low utilization of mental health services and worse mental health outcomes related to higher morbidity and mortality (20, 21).
Previous studies have also shown that pregnant African immigrant women had better self-rated physical and mental health compared to US-born and Caribbean-born pregnant Black women (10), likely due to the healthy migrant effect (6, 22). The healthy migrant effect refers to the concept that migrants tend to have better health status than people of similar backgrounds in the host country (23); however, over time, likely due to the effect of racism, gender and migration, this apparent advantage is diminished (23, 24). In our sample, the willingness to seek professional mental health services, especially pharmacotherapy was particularly low.
There are higher somatization rates among African immigrants, compared to US born Black people; African immigrants tend to focus on physical health symptoms and prefer primary care health professionals (6, 7). In our study, respondents endorsed anxiety and low mood symptoms, such as difficulty sleeping, elevated heart rate, tearfulness, irritability and generally feeling overwhelmed. Due to somatization, pregnant African immigrant women are at elevated risk of health care professionals not recognizing their symptoms. Therefore, they may experience further delay in initiation and engagement in mental health services in pregnancy, where early intervention is critical (4, 25).
Our finding should be considered in the context of the study design; though the sample size was small, there were several areas of consensus around conceptualization of mental illness and associated stigma.
Conclusion
This study shows conceptualization of mental illness, stigmatizing views and specific negative attitudes towards medication use among peripartum and postpartum African immigrant women. Understanding the perspectives of pregnant African immigrant women at the intersection of their race, ethnicity, gender and migrant status is necessary to address mental illness stigma that leads to low utilization of mental health services within our health systems (6, 7).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
References
