Abstract
Background Morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 is increased in patients with B-cell depleting therapies, the majority of which also show compromised vaccination-induced immune responses. Herein, we report on the trajectories of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients from the original RituxiVac study compared to healthy volunteers and investigate the immunogenicity of a third vaccination in previously non-responding patients.
Methods A follow-up evaluation was performed in volunteers and patients from the RituxiVac Study (NCT04877496), which investigated the humoral and cell-mediated immune response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with a history with anti-CD20 depleting therapies (rituximab or ocrelizumab). The current population included 33 patients and 26 healthy volunteers with initial humoral vaccine response and 32 non-responding patients. Primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody trajectories in vaccine responders 4.3 months (median; interquartile range [IQR]: 3.6 – 4.8 months) after first evaluation and humoral responses after a third vaccine dose in previous non-responders. Antibody decay rates were compared using analysis of covariance in linear regression.
Results In patients with detectable anti-spike IgG antibodies after two-dose vaccination, circulating anti-spike IgG persisted in 88% (29/33) of patients 5.6 months after the second vaccination (median; IQR: 5.1-6.7) compared to 92% (24/26) of healthy volunteers 6.8 months after the second dose (IQR: 6.0-7.1) (p=0.7). Antibody decay rates were comparable between patients and controls with −0.54 signal/cut-off (s/c) units per month (IQR −0.72 to −0.45) and −0.60 s/c units per month (IQR: −0.88 to −0.44), p=0.70. Two-dose responders with loss of circulating antibodies at follow-up (n=4/33, 12%) had lower initial antibody concentrations (p<0.01). Biomarkers for immunocompetence, including CD3, CD4 or CD19 cell count at baseline did not predict anti-spike IgG persistence. In two-dose non-responders, a third dose of mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 elicited humoral response with detectable anti-spike IgG antibodies in 19% (6/32) participants. No clinical parameters nor biomarkers of immunocompetence predicted humoral response after a third vaccine dose.
Conclusion The present study reveals comparable antibody reduction rates between patients with CD20-depleting treatment history and healthy volunteers, but inefficient humoral responses to a third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in the majority of two-dose non-responders. There is a need for individually tailored vaccination strategies in immunocompromised patients that could be stratified by B cell counts and initial level of antibody titers. (Funded by Bern University Hospital, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04877496)
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The current study was funded by Bern University Hospital. The funder had no role in design, interpretation of results, manuscript drafting or decision to publish the results.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data are available from the authors on request.
