Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A systematic review of anaesthetic agents used in Drug Induced Sedation Endoscopy (DISE) and a description of a new DISE technique

Oliver Sanders, Bhik Kotecha, Vik Veer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.02.21267209
Oliver Sanders
1Southend University Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: oliver.sanders4{at}nhs.net
Bhik Kotecha
2Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vik Veer
2Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives Drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a standardly used investigation for surgical planning in obstructive sleep apnoea management once conservative treatments have proven inadequate. There are a variety of anaesthetic agents used to obtain sedation necessary for DISE. These agents may have different effect on the upper airway and other parameters important in the diagnosis of the site of collapse during sleep. We aimed to review the commonly agents and evaluate the significance of their impact on the the diagnosis.

Methods A search was conducted through PubMed looking for studies on commonly used anaesthetic agents and their effect on the upper airway and cardiopulmonary parameters. Results: Of the 109 studies yielded by the search, 19 were deemed relevant to the review and met all inclusion criteria. The agents reviewed were: propofol, dexmedetomidine, remifentanil, isoflurane, sevoflurane, midazolam and topical lidocaine. A meta-analysis was not conducted due to the limited number of relevant studies and the heterogeneity of outcomes measured. All agents examined gave some element of airway collapse and impact on cardiopulmonary measures. Most of these effects were shown to be dose-dependent. Of the agents considered dexmedetomidine and propofol gave the most consistently reliable and physiologically safe representations of upper airway collapse seen in OSA patients.

Conclusion There is limited information and no industry standard for the sedative regimen used for DISE. Of the agents reviewed those that caused least cardiopulmonary instability, respiratory depression and exaggerated upper airway collapse were deemed the most appropriate for DISE. The agent that best meet these criteria is dexmedetomidine followed by propofol.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 05, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A systematic review of anaesthetic agents used in Drug Induced Sedation Endoscopy (DISE) and a description of a new DISE technique
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A systematic review of anaesthetic agents used in Drug Induced Sedation Endoscopy (DISE) and a description of a new DISE technique
Oliver Sanders, Bhik Kotecha, Vik Veer
medRxiv 2021.12.02.21267209; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.02.21267209
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A systematic review of anaesthetic agents used in Drug Induced Sedation Endoscopy (DISE) and a description of a new DISE technique
Oliver Sanders, Bhik Kotecha, Vik Veer
medRxiv 2021.12.02.21267209; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.02.21267209

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Otolaryngology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)