Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Estimating the impact of implementation and timing of the COVID-19 vaccination programme in Brazil: a counterfactual analysis

View ORCID ProfileLeonardo Souto Ferreira, View ORCID ProfileFlavia Maria Darcie Marquitti, View ORCID ProfileRafael Lopes Paixão da Silva, View ORCID ProfileMarcelo Eduardo Borges, View ORCID ProfileMarcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes, View ORCID ProfileOswaldo Gonçalves Cruz, View ORCID ProfileRoberto André Kraenkel, View ORCID ProfileRenato Mendes Coutinho, View ORCID ProfilePaulo Inácio Prado, View ORCID ProfileLeonardo Soares Bastos
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.24.21268384
Leonardo Souto Ferreira
aInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leonardo Souto Ferreira
Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
cInstituto de Física ‘Gleb Wataghin’ and Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti
  • For correspondence: flamarquitti{at}gmail.com
Rafael Lopes Paixão da Silva
aInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rafael Lopes Paixão da Silva
Marcelo Eduardo Borges
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marcelo Eduardo Borges
Marcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
dFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de Computação Científica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes
Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
dFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de Computação Científica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz
Roberto André Kraenkel
aInstituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Roberto André Kraenkel
Renato Mendes Coutinho
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
eCentro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Renato Mendes Coutinho
Paulo Inácio Prado
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
fInstituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paulo Inácio Prado
Leonardo Soares Bastos
bObservatório COVID-19 BR
dFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Programa de Computação Científica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leonardo Soares Bastos
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Vaccines developed between 2020 - 2021 against the SARS-CoV-2 virus were designed to diminish the severity and prevent deaths due to COVID-19. However, estimates of the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns in achieving these goals remain a methodological challenge. In this work, we developed a Bayesian statistical model to estimate the number of deaths and hospitalisations averted by vaccination of older adults (above 60 years old) in Brazil.

Methods We fit a linear model to predict the number of deaths and hospitalisations of older adults as a function of vaccination coverage in this group and casualties in younger adults. We used this model in a counterfactual analysis, simulating alternative scenarios without vaccination or with faster vaccination roll-out. We estimated the direct effects of COVID-19 vaccination by computing the difference between hypothetical and realised scenarios.

Findings We estimated that more than 165,000 individuals above 60 years of age were not hospitalised due to COVID-19 in the first seven months of the vaccination campaign. An additional contingent of 104,000 hospitalisations could have been averted if vaccination had started earlier. We also estimated that more than 58 thousand lives were saved by vaccinations in the period analysed for the same age group and that an additional 47 thousand lives could have been saved had the Brazilian government started the vaccination programme earlier.

Interpretation Our estimates provided a lower bound for vaccination impacts in Brazil, demonstrating the importance of preventing the suffering and loss of older Brazilian adults. Once vaccines were approved, an early vaccination roll-out could have saved many more lives, especially when facing a pandemic.

Funding The Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brazil (Finance Code 001 to FMDM and LSF), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – Brazil (grant number: 315854/2020-0 to MEB, 141698/2018-7 to RLPS, 313055/2020-3 to PIP, 311832/2017-2 to RAK), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – Brazil (contract number: 2016/01343-7 to RAK), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – Brazil (grant number: E-26/201.277/2021 to LSB) and Inova Fiocruz/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – Brazil (grant number: 48401485034116) to LSB, OGC and MGFC. The funding agencies had no role in the conceptualization of the study.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The authors thank the research funding agencies: the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior -- Brazil (Finance Code 001 to FMDM and LSF), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico -- Brazil (grant number: 315854/2020-0 to MEB, 141698/2018-7 to RLPS, 313055/2020-3 to PIP, 311832/2017-2 to RAK), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo -- Brazil (contract number: 2016/01343-7 to RAK), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro -- Brazil (grant number: E-26/201.277/2021 to LSB) and Inova Fiocruz/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz -- Brazil to LSB. The funding agencies had no role in the conceptualization of the study.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • A table was missing.

Data Availability

All data and code used in this work is publicly available at https://github.com/covid19br/ bayes-vacina-paper.

https://github.com/covid19br/bayes-vacina-paper

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 03, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Estimating the impact of implementation and timing of the COVID-19 vaccination programme in Brazil: a counterfactual analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Estimating the impact of implementation and timing of the COVID-19 vaccination programme in Brazil: a counterfactual analysis
Leonardo Souto Ferreira, Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti, Rafael Lopes Paixão da Silva, Marcelo Eduardo Borges, Marcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes, Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz, Roberto André Kraenkel, Renato Mendes Coutinho, Paulo Inácio Prado, Leonardo Soares Bastos
medRxiv 2021.12.24.21268384; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.24.21268384
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Estimating the impact of implementation and timing of the COVID-19 vaccination programme in Brazil: a counterfactual analysis
Leonardo Souto Ferreira, Flavia Maria Darcie Marquitti, Rafael Lopes Paixão da Silva, Marcelo Eduardo Borges, Marcelo Ferreira da Costa Gomes, Oswaldo Gonçalves Cruz, Roberto André Kraenkel, Renato Mendes Coutinho, Paulo Inácio Prado, Leonardo Soares Bastos
medRxiv 2021.12.24.21268384; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.24.21268384

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)