ABSTRACT
Context Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are ubiquitous during initial entry military training, with overuse injuries in the lower extremities the most frequent. A common mechanism for overuse injuries is running, an activity that is an integral part of United States Coast Guard (USCG) training and a requirement for graduation.
Objective Assess the effects of athletic footwear choice on lower quarter MSKI risk in USCG recruits.
Design Descriptive Epidemiological Study
Setting USCG Training Center, Cape May, NJ
Participants A retrospective cohort study was performed in which 1229 recruits (1038 males, 191 females) were allowed to self-select athletic footwear during training. A group of 2876 recruits (2260 males, 616 females) who trained under a policy that required obligatory wear of prescribed athletic shoes served as a control.
Main Outcome Measures Demographic data and physical performance were derived from administrative records. Injury data were abstracted from a medical tracking database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess group, age, sex, height, body mass, and run times on MSKI outcomes.
Results Ankle-foot, leg, knee and lumbopelvic-hip complex diagnoses were ubiquitous in both groups (experimental: 20.37 to 29.34 per 1000 recruits; control: 18.08 to 25.59 per 1000 recruits). Group was not a significant factor for any of the injuries assessed. Sex was a significant factor in all injury types, with female recruits demonstrating ∼2.00 greater odds of experiencing running-related injuries (RRIs), overuse injuries, or any MSKI in general. When considering ankle-foot or bone stress injuries, the risk in female recruits was 3.73 to 4.11 greater odds than their male counterparts. Run time was a significant predictor in RRI, all overuse injuries, and for any MSKI in general.
Conclusion While footwear choice did not influence MSKI risk in USCG recruits, female sex was a primary, nonmodifiable intrinsic risk factor.
Key Points
Self-selection of athletic footwear was not a significant factor for MSKI in USCG recruits, despite widespread reports of discomfort and perceived deleterious effects of wear.
MSKI continues to be a major source of morbidity in the recruit training population, with female sex found to be a robust and significant factor regardless of footwear choice.
While there is no indication that prescribed athletic footwear is associated with MSKI, policymakers should factor in individual preference when considering the mandate for wear.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. SS105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. SS 101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, nor the U.S. Government. The study protocol was approved by the US Coast Guard Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.
Funding Statement
The authors are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part their official duties. This study did not receive any external funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Research data were derived from an exempted US Coast Guard Institutional Review Board protocol.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
email: Ryan.Pommier{at}uscg.mil
email: andrewmacgregor{at}protonmail.com
email: amy.b.silder.ctr{at}mail.mil
email: sandetod{at}gvsu.edu
Disclaimer: The authors are military service members or employees of the U.S. Government. This work was prepared as part their official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. §105 provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the U.S. Government. Title 17, U.S.C. §101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person’s official duties. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, United States Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security, nor the U.S. Government. The study protocol was approved by the US Coast Guard Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an exempted US Coast Guard Institutional Review Board protocol.
Data Availability
Due to the nature of this research, participants of this study did not agree for their data to be shared publicly, so supporting data is not available.
