Abstract
Background Early and proper diagnosis of laryngeal lesions is necessary to begin treatment of the patient as soon as possible with the possibility of preserve organ functions. Imaging examinations are oft aided by artificial intelligence (AI) to improve quality and facilitate appropriate diagnosis. The aim of the study is to investigate of the diagnostic utility of AI in laryngeal endoscopy.
Methods Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for studies published before October 15, 2021 implementing artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced models assessing images of laryngeal lesions taken during laryngeal endoscopy. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
Results All 13 included studies presented overall low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models was very high (from 0.806 to 0.997) and the number of images used to build and evaluate the models ranged from 120 to 24,667. The accuracy was significantly higher in studies using larger database. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for identification of healthy laryngeal tissue (8 studies) was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99), respectively. The same values for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions (7 studies) were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86-0.96) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99), respectively. The analysis was extended to a comparison of sensitivity and specificity of AI models assessing Narrow Band Imaging (3 studies) and white light endoscopy images (4 studies). The results were similar for both methods, no subgroup effect was revealed (p = 0.406 for sensitivity and p = 0.817 for specificity).
Conclusions In assessing images of laryngeal lesions, AI demonstrates extraordinarily high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. AI enhanced diagnostic tools should be introduced into everyday clinical work. The performance of AI diagnoses increases efficacy with the size of the image database when using similar standards for evaluating images. The multicentre cooperation should concentrate on creation of huge database of laryngeal lesions images and implement their sharing, which allows building AI modes with the best performance, based on vast amount of images for learning and testing.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
