Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Effectiveness of the EPA-based ‘Toolbox Family Medicine’ on students’ learning satisfaction: study protocol for a controlled trial

Nicola Amarell, Maximilian Wehner, Johanna Schroeder, Dorothea Wild, Thomas Welchowski, Birgitta Weltermann
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.18.22269060
Nicola Amarell
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maximilian Wehner
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Maximilian.Wehner{at}ukbonn.de
Johanna Schroeder
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dorothea Wild
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Welchowski
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birgitta Weltermann
Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Family practices constitute an important learning environment for medical students. However, teaching situations markedly vary between practices, and students frequently find rotations underwhelming. Especially, students’ active participation in patient care varies profoundly, although it has a significant impact on students’ interest in primary care careers. To standardize and improve learning situations in practices, we developed the so-called ‘Toolbox Family Medicine (TFM)’ using the concept of entrustable professional activities. It provides standardized learning content appropriate for students’ levels and allows teaching adaptable to actual practice conditions.

Methods Using a controlled trial with a waiting list control arm, we will evaluate the effectiveness of the toolbox on students’ learning satisfaction. A total of 94 students will be allocated 1:1 to intervention and control practices. The teaching concept ‘Toolbox Family Medicine (TFM)’ comprises a didactic workshop for supervising physicians and a toolbox with practice-specific tasks for medical students. The primary outcome is students’ overall satisfaction with their learning progress after the rotation. Secondary outcomes include the kind and number of tasks performed, the entrusted level per task, the feasibility of implementing the toolbox in actual practice settings, and students’ motivation to pursue a career in primary care.

Discussion We assume an improvement in learning satisfaction with the intervention. The study will begin with the next practice rotations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study is financed by the Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Germany. The study conduct is supported by the Program for Teaching Quality of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn by funding a student research assistant.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Bonn waived ethical approval for this study (August 26, 2021).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Nicola.Amarell{at}ukbonn.de

  • Johanna.Schroeder{at}ukbonn.de

  • Dorothea.Wild{at}ukbonn.de

  • Welchow{at}imbie.meb.uni-bonn.de

  • Birgitta.Weltermann{at}ukbonn.de

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study will be available upon reasonable request to the authors

  • Abbreviations

    EPA
    Entrustable Professional Activity
    TFM
    Toolbox Family Medicine
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted January 21, 2022.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Effectiveness of the EPA-based ‘Toolbox Family Medicine’ on students’ learning satisfaction: study protocol for a controlled trial
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Effectiveness of the EPA-based ‘Toolbox Family Medicine’ on students’ learning satisfaction: study protocol for a controlled trial
    Nicola Amarell, Maximilian Wehner, Johanna Schroeder, Dorothea Wild, Thomas Welchowski, Birgitta Weltermann
    medRxiv 2022.01.18.22269060; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.18.22269060
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Effectiveness of the EPA-based ‘Toolbox Family Medicine’ on students’ learning satisfaction: study protocol for a controlled trial
    Nicola Amarell, Maximilian Wehner, Johanna Schroeder, Dorothea Wild, Thomas Welchowski, Birgitta Weltermann
    medRxiv 2022.01.18.22269060; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.18.22269060

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Medical Education
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)