ABSTRACT
Background Clozapine, the only evidence-based drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia is associated with agranulocytosis. For this reason, all clozapine patients are required to undergo mandatory regular blood monitoring throughout their clozapine treatment. The blood test results are reported using a traffic light system. The clozapine treatment is stopped immediately after a confirmed red result, which is the indication for risk of agranulocytosis. The need for blood tests places a burden on patients and acts as a barrier to clozapine treatment. There is growing evidence that the risk of agranulocytosis falls steeply after the first few months of treatment, raising the possibility that clozapine monitoring could be discontinued after a certain period of treatment.
Aim To investigate the frequency density of the confirmed red results from clozapine monitoring across clozapine treatment.
Method By merging electronic health records (EHR) data with clozapine blood monitoring data, we identified the clozapine treatment dates. The EHR data was from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM). The clozapine blood monitoring data was from Zaponex Treatment Access System (ZTAS). ZTAS is one of the mandatory blood monitoring service providers in the United Kingdom. From these data, Kaplan-Meier survival curve was fitted to determine the time to get confirmed red results. At fixed points in the treatment, the future risk of obtaining a red result were calculated.
Results By merging over 301,000 data points that came from the blood monitoring results and EHR data of 1,362 patients, we identified 1,891 clozapine treatment periods. Of these, 75 treatments were stopped due to confirmed red results. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve and the incidence rates data showed that 56 (74.7%) confirmed red results occur within the first 6 months of clozapine treatment.
Conclusion We found a contrast between the relatively high density of the confirmed red results at the beginning of clozapine treatment which significantly reduces after 6 months of treatment which remained low thereafter.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS) system funded and developed by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The research was conducted under ethical approval reference 18/SC/0372 from Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee C.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Role of Funding. This work was supported by the Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS) system funded and developed by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London and a joint infrastructure grant from Guy’s and St Thomas’ Charity and the Maudsley Charity (grant number BRC-2011-10035). All authors receive salary support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NHS, or the Department of Health. The above funding had no role in the study design; in analysis, and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Data Availability
This is a retrospective cohort study was carried out using data from the electronic records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM). This data cannot be made available. The analysis used a de-identified data resource approved by Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee C (reference 18/SC/0372).
