Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The validity and reliability of parent’s recall for routine Immunization in Cameroon: an evaluative study

View ORCID ProfileMartin Ndinakie Yakum, Atanga Desmond Funwie, Atem Bethel Ajong, Zahir Shah
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.17.22271070
Martin Ndinakie Yakum
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical and Health sciences, Kesmonds International University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Ndinakie Yakum
  • For correspondence: martinyakum{at}yahoo.com
Atanga Desmond Funwie
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical and Health sciences, Kesmonds International University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Atem Bethel Ajong
2Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Dschang-Cameroon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zahir Shah
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical and Health sciences, Kesmonds International University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Introduction In the absence of immunization documentations, parent’s recall is used to assess children immunization status. During the 2018 demograhpic and health survey in Cameroon, parent’s recall was the only source of information for 47% of chidren assessed for immunization coverage. The objective of this study was to determine the validity of parent’s recall for immunization using the vaccination card as the reference in Yaounde-Cameroon.

Methods The study targeting parents of children aged 0-59months who had their children’s vaccination cards. The immunization history of each child was taken based on both parent’s recall and vaccination card. Using the vaccination card as a reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were calculated. The degree of agreement and the kappa statistics between the two methods were calculated using R version 4.1.0 (2021-05-18).

Results A total of 529 households were visited and 87 elligible parents enrolled. Approximately 55.2% of the children were girls and 53% of them were aged 12-59 months. In total, 94.25% of the participants enrolled were one of the biological parents of the children, with mothers making the majority 86.20% of participants. When combined for all vaccines in the EPI (i.e. one dose BCG, 4 doses of OPV, 3 doses of pentavalent vaccine, 3 doses of PCV-13, 2 doses of rotavirus vaccine, one dose of measles/rubella vaccine and one dose of the yellow fever vaccine), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of parent’s recall were 63%, 60%, 90%, and 23% respectively. The degree of agreement between the two sources was highest for BCG(94%) and lowest with Polio2(32%). Parent’s recall(94%) was most likely to correctly predict BCG vaccination status of a child than using the scars on the forarm(74%).

Conclusion Our conclusion is that validity and reliability of parent’s recall vary a lot across different vaccines and parent’s recall is not very reliable for immunization status assessment in children. Parent’s recall is preferred for verifying BCG immunization to scars on the forarm. In general, we recommend that parent’s recall for routine immunization should be used only as a last resort or for BCG, and measles and Yellow Fever vaccines.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Regional Ethics Committee for the Centre region, Cameroon

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • revision of the author list and data quality control data included

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files

  • LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

    Abbreviation
    Definition
    BCG
    Calmette-Guérin Bacillus (vaccine)
    CI
    Confidence interval
    DHS
    Demographic Health Survey
    DPT-HepB+Hib
    Diphtheria, Pertusis, Tetanus and Hepatitis B + Haemophilus Influenzae type b
    EPI
    Expanded Program of Immunization
    Hib
    Haemophilus Influenzae type b
    Hepb
    Hepatitis B vaccine
    IPV
    Inactivated Polio Vaccine
    Ka
    Kappa statistics
    MR
    Measles and Rubella vaccine
    NPV
    Negative predictive value
    OR
    Odds ratio
    OPV
    Oral Polio Vaccine
    PCV-13
    Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine 13
    Penta
    Diphtheria, Pertusis, Tetanus and Hepatitis B + Haemophilus Influenzae type b
    PPV
    Positive predictive value
    DPT+Hib+HepB
    Diphtheria, Pertusis, Tetanus and Hepatitis B + Haemophilus Influenzae type b
    d.a
    degree agreement
    rota
    Rotavirus vaccine
    Se
    Sensitivity
    Sp
    Specificity
    YF
    Yellow Fever
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted August 05, 2022.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The validity and reliability of parent’s recall for routine Immunization in Cameroon: an evaluative study
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    The validity and reliability of parent’s recall for routine Immunization in Cameroon: an evaluative study
    Martin Ndinakie Yakum, Atanga Desmond Funwie, Atem Bethel Ajong, Zahir Shah
    medRxiv 2022.02.17.22271070; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.17.22271070
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    The validity and reliability of parent’s recall for routine Immunization in Cameroon: an evaluative study
    Martin Ndinakie Yakum, Atanga Desmond Funwie, Atem Bethel Ajong, Zahir Shah
    medRxiv 2022.02.17.22271070; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.17.22271070

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Public and Global Health
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)