Breast and colorectal cancer awareness in Malaysians and barriers towards screening: A systematic review

Symptom knowledge

Awareness about 16 BC symptoms was reported in eight studies. All the symptoms of knowledge were evaluated through the cross-sectional method. Out of nine studies, three studies are low quality while the other six studies are medium quality. The most commonly surveyed BC symptoms were ‘painless breast lump’, ‘nipple discharge’ and ‘pain in breast/ breast region’ (Table 3a). The most commonly recognised symptoms were ‘painless breast lump’ (27.6% - 90.8%), ‘nipple discharge’ (1.6% - 74.5%) and ‘pain in breast/ breast region’ (11.5% - 82.8%). Furthermore, more than 50% of participants from six out of nine studies recognised ‘painless breast lump’ (58.1% - 90.8%), and seven out of nine studies recognised ‘nipple discharge’ (65.9% - 74.5%) as symptoms of breast cancer. ‘Lump under armpit’ (69.0% - 78.6%), ‘change in breast shape’ (3.4% - 81.5%) and ‘nipple retraction’ (11.5% - 82.8%) were few symptoms of breast cancer which were discussed in four studies. The least commonly reported symptoms of breast cancer were ‘painful lump’ (17.6%) (23), ‘asymmetry of the breast’ (44.8%) (22), ‘change in breast size’ (41.5%) (24), ‘breast mass’ (61.0%) (20) and ‘itchiness and discolouration of nipple’ (41.6%) (22). Across studies, more than 65% of respondents consistently identified ‘lump under armpit’ (69.0% ^- 78.6%) as a breast cancer symptom. Besides that, all the reviewed studies reported symptom knowledge as a percentage (%) except for one study which reported means. In this study, respondents were significantly unaware of BC non-lump symptoms such as changes in the position of the nipple, retraction of the nipple, puckering or breast dimpling, breast pain, armpit pain, a rash of the nipple, redness of the skin of the breast, change in size and shape of the breast and nipple compared to BC lump symptoms.

Barriers towards screening

Only two studies explored the barriers towards BC screening in Malaysian women (26, 27) (Table 3). In those two studies, nine barriers towards mammogram screening were reported. All the barriers towards mammogram screening studies were evaluated through a cross-sectional method. Out of two studies, one was low quality while other was medium quality. Both studies assessed whether ‘financial issues’ (10% - 17.5%) was a barrier towards screening, otherwise, the two studies assessed different barriers. ‘Lack of time’ (42.5%) was the most commonly reported barrier (26), followed by ‘do not know the purpose of mammogram’ (32%) (26) and the ‘perception that they are not at risk’ (30%) (27). Furthermore, barriers such as ‘mammogram screening are painful’ (20%), ‘mammogram is an unnecessary test’ (14%) and ‘afraid of the test result’ (20%) were less commonly reported barriers.

Symptom Knowledge

Awareness about 14 CRC symptoms was assessed in 10 out of 11 CRC studies. All the 10 studies were analysed by the cross-sectional method. Quality of seven studies was scored under medium quality while the other three studies scored under low quality. The most-reported CRC symptoms were ‘change in bowel habits (new-onset diarrhoea or constipation)’, ‘bleeding and/or bleeding from the back passage’ and ‘weight loss’ (Table 4). The most commonly recognised symptoms were ‘blood in stool’ (40.6% - 86.9%), ‘change in bowel habits (new-onset diarrhoea or constipation)’ (28.4% - 86.6%), abdominal pain (31.4% - 85.6%) and ‘weight loss’ (9.3% - 83.4%). Out of 13 CRC symptoms, 10 symptoms were recognized by >50% of participants from four out of eight studies, except for ‘piles’ (49.2%), ‘mucus in stool’ (2.2%), ‘difficulties swallowing’ (35.4%) and ‘tiredness/anaemia’ (27.7% - 35.1%), which were recognised by <50% of participants. Furthermore, the least commonly surveyed symptoms of CRC were ‘piles’ (49.2%), ‘constipation’ (53.4%), ‘mucus in stool’ (2.2%), ‘difficulties swallowing’ (35.4%) and ‘loss of appetite’ (63.5%).

Barriers towards screening

Out of the eleven CRC studies, five studies reported barriers towards CRC screening (Table 4) (28, 29, 34-36). A total of 18 barriers were assessed through the cross-sectional method from all the 5 studies. Three studies were identified with medium quality while the other two studies were with low quality. The most commonly observed barrier towards CRC screening was ‘fear of result’ (27.6% ^- 32.1%). The most commonly expressed barriers towards CRC screening were ‘don’t know if I should have faecal occult blood test (FOBT)’ (50.8%), ‘FOBT is a painful test’ (51.5% - 53.5%) (28, 34), ‘screening is embarrassing’ (35.2% - 55.1%), ‘fear of discomfort’ (30% - 63.8%⁾ and ‘expensive’ (22.6% - 53.4%).

Symptom Knowledge

Among ten studies on breast cancer, knowledge for symptoms was discussed in eight studies. All the studies were conducted in Kuala Lumpur (1), Selangor (5), and Penang (2), the most developed states in Malaysia. Level of awareness of some BC symptoms such as ‘painless breast lump’, ‘lump under armpit’, ‘swollen axillary glands’, ‘nipple discharge’, ‘change in breast shape’, ‘discolouration of the breast’, ‘pain in breast/ breast region’, ‘enlargement of neighbouring lymph nodes’, ‘dimpling of breast skin’, ‘breast skin retraction’ and ‘nipple retraction’ are consistently discussed in different locations in Malaysia, besides there are also other specific symptoms of BC that many other participants were unable to identify. ‘Painless breast lump’ and ‘nipple discharge’ were the most (19, 20, 22-25, 37, 38) and ‘pain in breast/ breast region’ (19, 20, 23-25, 38) was the second most recognised BC symptom identified in this systematic review. Of these, six studies were assessed as being medium quality. More than half of the studies showed that these were the most frequently recognised BC symptoms. The ‘painless breast lump’ and ‘nipple discharge’ were recognised as early BC symptoms by over 55% of participants from a mix of urban and suburban areas in Kuala Lumpur (1), Selangor (4), and Penang (1). However, ‘pain in breast/ breast region’ was only identified by participants from Kuala Lumpur (82.8%) and Penang (78.5%) recognized. ‘Nipple discharge’ and ‘pain in breast/ breast region’ were two symptoms that were consistent with the outcomes of research focused primarily on women from the United Kingdom (71.9% and 53.4%) (12), China (55.2% and 51.7%) (39) and Iran (86.6% and 75.6%) (40). In this systematic review, participants from selected urban and suburban areas (Malaysia) exhibited the least knowledge of ‘painless breast lump’ (27.6%), ‘painful lump’ (17.6%), ‘nipple discharge’ (1.6%), ‘change in breast shape’ (3.4%) and ‘pain in the breast/breast region’ (11.5%) as the symptoms of BC (23). This is similar to a study conducted among women from suburban area in India reported that ‘painless lump’ (13%), ‘breast pain’ (16%) and ‘nipple discharge’ (8%) except ‘painless breast lump’ (44%) as symptoms of BC (41). Besides, findings were consistent with a study which was conducted among participants from a rural area (located in south-western Nigeria) who indicated that ‘painless lump’ (1.9%) and nipple discharge (0.5%) as symptoms of BC (42). This suggests that women from rural as well as suburban areas have poor knowledge of the symptoms of BC. Poor knowledge in recognizing BC symptoms is likely to delay the seeking of health care. Moreover, the finding indicates that only five studies have addressed the ‘lump under armpit’ which is a key symptom of BC.

Consistently, more than 65% of Malaysians women recognised this as a symptom of BC. These findings were marginally higher with previous research with women from the United Kingdom, which has exhibited that ‘lump under armpit’ (86.1%) was likely to be attributed to BC (12). Besides, Grunfeld et al. reported that 80% of women surveyed from the United Kingdom recognised ‘lump under armpit’ as a symptom of BC (43). Our result indicates that three studies which were conducted among women from a mix of urban and suburban areas (Shah Alam and Klang Valley) showed that most of them are able to identify ‘breast lump’ (90.8%, 89.3% and 73.5%) compared to ‘nipple discharge’ (72.1%, 70.4% and 47.6%) as a symptom of BC. A previous study in the UK also showed similar finding of high knowledge about ‘breast lump’ (93.3%) as a symptom of breast cancer and low knowledge about ‘nipple discharge’ (71.9%) (12). In addition, three among four studies have reported that less than 50% of Malaysian women recognise ‘nipple retraction’ as a BC symptom. Two out of three studies are carried out among urban and educated women such as from Selangor living undergraduate students and school teachers. However, this finding contradicts with the study which was carried out among university students from Muscat where more than half of the them were considered above as a symptom of BC (44). This may reflect discrepancies in study designs, modes of recruitment or sampling procedures of the study.

Barriers towards cancer screening

The two studies that reported barriers towards BC screening were conducted among 40-year-old women from Selangor. Out of two studies, barriers towards BC screening from one study were prompted through the questionnaire, whereas the barriers were identified by the participants in another study. In this review, the most common barriers towards BC screening ‘Cost’ known the common and only less than 20% of participants are facing those barriers to BC screening. It is because BC screening (mammogram) can be carried out in 16 private clinics and hospitals registered with the National Population and Family Development Board (2007). The cost is subsidized by the Development Ministry of Women, Family and Community where it offers an RM50 subsidy for each mammography session. The finding was marginally consistent with findings of the past study by Wood and his team, which 35% of people from Santiago, Chile still facing the financial barrier (‘cost’) (45). Moreover, the results of a study conducted in Hong Kong by Margaret Chua and his team among Chinese women showed that ‘cost’ was the most frequently reported barrier to screen for BC. (46). Furthermore, slightly more than half of Malaysians still do not know ‘where to go for BC screening’ (26). This shows that there is still a lack of knowledge and awareness among the Malaysian population on the hospitals or clinics that provide BC screening service. ‘Lack of time or being too busy’ to schedule mammography was another reason mentioned by Malaysian women in this review and were assessed as low quality (26). A possible reason for the above-mentioned barriers of mammography among Malaysian women may be being reluctant about the seriousness of BC. The present review finding is in line with women aged more than 40 years from West Bank whom also mentioned that ‘lack of time or being too busy’ (47%) as the most common barrier (47). In addition, a study among low-income Asian-American participants also has reported that ‘lack of time or being too busy’ as the most common barrier (48). This was also one of the most common reasons mentioned by Chinese women in Hong Kong for reluctance to participate in mammography screening (49). This study also reported that 20% of Malaysian women are still ‘afraid of the mammogram result’ (26) and ‘believe that mammogram screening is painful’ (27). The present finding also supports Garbers and his team’s research study which concluded that low-income women from New York are ‘afraid of the mammogram result’ (50). Previous studies among Arab and Filipino women living in the United States have reported similar findings on the ‘afraid of the mammogram result’ as a barrier (51-53). Afraid of discovering cancer is more associated with the cultural impact as the dynamics of the family and the assumption of cancer fatalism will have an impact on a women’s life. This barrier could be improved by effectively addressed through culturally appropriate awareness and intervention programs. In addition, the barrier ‘believes that mammogram screening is painful’ found in this review in accordance with the barrier that stated by both Filipino and Asian-Indian women living in the United States (53). Another research found that as compared to non-obese, obese women were significantly more likely to feel ‘pain’ from mammograms (54). Other research has also shown that up to 35% of women undergoing mammograms complain of ‘pain’ (20% in this study), and that pain acts as a barrier to other women returning for mammograms screening (55). Similar findings on the above mentioned barrier to mammogram were previously been published through few studies (50, 52). By providing information on privacy and gentle handling of the breasts during the procedure can help to minimise the pain or uncomfortable feelings during BC screening among Malaysian women.

Symptom Knowledge

Among nine studies on CRC, knowledge of symptoms was discussed in eight studies. All these studies were conducted in seven different states and those places are known as the most developed states in Malaysia. In this systematic review, a study which was conducted among friends and relatives accompanying patients to the general medical clinic in the University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur were demonstrated the least (less than 40%) frequently identified unprompted symptoms of CRC such as ‘change in bowel habit’ (37.5%), ‘bleeding and/or bleeding from back passage’ (34.3%), ‘mucus in the stool’ (2.2%), ‘abdominal pain’ (31.4%), and ‘weight loss’ (9.3%). Moreover, another study among participants from the rural area of Perak (Malaysia) also showed that less than 41% of them recognized prompted symptoms of CRC correctly including ‘change in bowel habit’ (28.4%), ‘incomplete emptying of bowel’ (26.7%), ‘blood in the stool’ (40.6%), ‘bleeding and/or bleeding from back passage’ (37%), ‘back passage pain’ (24.6%), ‘abdominal pain’ (36.1%), ‘weight loss’ (33.1%) and ‘tiredness/anaemia’ (27.7%). This shows that rural as well as urban residents are unaware of CRC warning symptoms. Similarly, a study conducted among 350 outpatients of Mayo General Hospital, Ireland concluded that 26.6% of the participants were able to name at least a CRC symptom (59), suggesting that awareness is limited in low- and middle- as well as high-income countries. The outcomes of this study suggest that ‘change in bowel habits’ (30-32, 35, 36) and ‘weight loss’ (28, 30-32, 36) are the most commonly reported (or assessed??) symptoms of CRC. Less than 40% of participants from two (31, 36) studies could identify the above-mentioned symptoms as the key symptoms of CRC. The results are consistent with the results of earlier studies that conducted in the United Kingdom, which suggested that <30% of respondents recognised ‘change in bowel habits’ (11, 56-58) and ‘weight loss’ (11, 57-61) as a symptom of CRC. This also indicated that compared to participants who recall symptoms, the percentage of participants who recognized those symptoms as the key symptom of CRC was greater (31, 36). The next widely discussed symptoms were ‘abdominal pain’ (30-32, 36) followed by ‘incomplete emptying of bowel’ (28, 31, 32), ‘blood in the stool’ (30-32) and ‘bleeding’ (28, 35, 36). Out of four studies, two studies showed that more than 50% of Malaysians were able to identify ‘abdominal pain’ as one of the main symptoms of CRC, whereas two other studies show less than 50% of Malaysians. Past studies conducted among the population of Western Australia, the UK and Kuwait (57, 62, 63) indicated that more than 55% of participants were able to recognize ‘abdominal pain’ as a symptom of CRC, while another study in the UK disputes this result (58). More than 55% of Malaysians can recognize both ‘blood in the stool’ and ‘bleeding’ as CRC symptoms. Findings from this systematic review suggest that awareness about ‘blood in the stool’ and ‘bleeding’ is higher in Malaysians compared to the United Kingdom, Ireland, Gulf and Britain, which indicated that less than 40% of people were able to recognise the above symptoms (11, 56, 58-60).

Barriers towards cancer screening

All these studies were conducted in urban area such as Negeri Sembilan, Kuala Lumpur and Selangor among participants aged more than 18 years. In this systematic analysis, a study conducted among participants from western Malaysia was rated as low quality, but most barriers were addressed and least frequently (less than 40%) prompted barriers to CRC screening were found. This result is slightly similar with certain barriers that discussed in a recent study which was conducted among more than 50 years old population from the rural area of the USA such as ‘fear’ (25.4%), ‘financial barrier’ (25.4%), ‘no recommendation/referral’ (33.1%) and ‘discomfort’ (10.2%) (64). To overcome Malaysia’s financial barrier towards CRC screening by developing an intervention programme that focuses primarily on ways to minimize the cost of screening tests or enhance insurance coverage. Additionally, it also will be more beneficial for Malaysian to make more initiatives to improve insurance coverage and to advocate information relating to increased insurance coverage. This review also suggests that participants were prompted by researchers from two studies that ‘FOBT is a painful test’ (53.5 %) as a screening barrier, which suggests that participants do not know what an FOBT test as a providing a stool sample is unlikely to be painful. The most perceived barrier to screening was anxiety about knowing the outcome of screening (‘fear of the results’). This barrier to CRC screening was encountered by less than 35% of Malaysians. This is evidenced by a study conducted between the church members of the Appalachian area between 2002 and 2003. Less than 10% of respondents said that they were afraid to find out about the test result as the main concern for not being screened (65). Malaysian’s most recognised barriers to CRC was ‘screening is embarrassing’ (55.1%) and ‘fear of discomfort’ (63.8%). One study examined the association of embarrassment with CRC screening and found that 49% of African – Americans felt that the test was embarrassing (66). Although, another study showed that less than 10% of the Appalachians admitted that they felt uncomfortable or embarrassed to carry out a CRC screening test which was contrary to the Malaysians (65). Apart from that, slightly more than 50% of Malaysians said they did not know if they should have an FOBT (50.8%) (34) and FOBT is a very expensive test (53.4%) (35). The primary reason for Malaysia does not understand the importance of CRC screening is due to the lack of referral from the healthcare professionals and some even said that screening was not necessary. This indicates that a healthcare professional plays an important role in health decision-making for Malaysians. A study in Hong Kong identified that 86.0% of participants have agreed that cost as the main barrier to screening(67). A cross-sectional study of barriers between groups of people at risk for CRC in the Omaha Midwestern Metropolitan Area described that ‘fear of cancer diagnosis’ (42%), ‘embarrassment’ (35%) and ‘screening test costs’ (44 %) (68) were the main barriers towards screening. Poor awareness and negative perception towards CRC screening could be one of the main factors for these negative attitudes such as embarrassment, fear and pain. In particular, Leung and his team indicated that the feeling of embarrassment may be due to cultural beliefs, such as faecal aversion (69). Further, there were 83 research studies by high-income countries on the most commonly mentioned barriers to CRC screening was included in a recent systematic review. Few of them were consistent with the findings of this survey (70).