Abstract
Objectives Toilet users often report valuing privacy and safety more highly than reduced disease, but effects of urban sanitation interventions on such outcomes have never been assessed quantitatively. In this study, we evaluate the impact of a shared sanitation intervention on quality of life (QoL) and mental wellbeing.
Design We interviewed individuals living in intervention and control clusters of a recent non-randomised controlled trial, and used generalised linear mixed regression models to make an observational comparison of outcomes.
Setting low-income unsewered areas of Maputo City, Mozambique
Participants We interviewed 424 participants, 222 from the prior trial’s intervention group, and 202 from the control group.
Interventions The control group used low-quality pit latrines. The intervention group received high-quality shared toilets, contributing 10-15% of capital cost.
Outcomes Our primary outcome was the sanitation-related quality of life (SanQoL) index, which applies respondent-derived weights to combine toilet users’ perceptions of sanitation-related disgust, privacy, safety, health, and shame. Secondary outcomes were the WHO-5 mental wellbeing index and a sanitation visual analogue scale.
Results The intervention group experienced a 1.6 standard deviation gain in SanQoL compared to the control group. This adjusted SanQoL gain was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.29-0.38) on a 0-1 scale with control mean 0.49. Effect sizes were largest for safety and privacy attributes. Intervention respondents also experienced a 0.2 standard deviation gain in mental wellbeing. The adjusted gain was 6.2 (95% CI: 0.3-12.2) on a 0-100 scale with control mean 54.4.
Conclusions Quality of life outcomes highly valued by toilet users and can be improved by sanitation interventions. Such outcomes should be measured in future sanitation trials, to help identify interventions which most improve people’s lives. Since SanQoL weights are derived from respondent valuation, the measure can also be used in economic evaluation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Economic and Social Research Council through a PhD studentship. The fieldwork was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The funders had no role in the identification, design, conduct, or reporting of the analysis.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study received prior approval from the Comite Nacional de Bioetica para a Saude (IRB00002657) at the Ministry of Health in Mozambique, and the Research Ethics Committee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref: 14609).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Deidentified individual participant data, data dictionary and replication code are available open access on the LSHTM data repository.
