ABSTRACT
Background Fibromyalgia is a prevalent chronic pain condition characterized by widespread pain and sensory hypersensitivity. While much remains unknown about fibromyalgia’s neurobiological underpinnings, central nervous system alterations appear to be heavily implicated in its pathophysiology. Previous research examining brain structural abnormalities associated with fibromyalgia has yielded inconsistent findings. Thus, we followed previous methods to examine brain gray matter differences in fibromyalgia. We hypothesized that, relative to healthy controls, participants with fibromyalgia would exhibit lower gray matter volume in regions consistently implicated in fibromyalgia: the anterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex.
Methods This study used magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate regional and whole brain differences in gray matter among females with and without fibromyalgia. Group differences were analyzed with two-sample t-tests, controlling for total intracranial volume.
Results No significant differences in regional or whole brain gray matter volumes were detected between fibromyalgia and healthy controls.
Conclusions Results add to an existing body of disparate findings regarding brain gray matter volume differences in fibromyalgia, and suggest structural differences previously detected in fibromyalgia should be examined for reproducibility. Absent significant differences may also suggest that functional, but not structural, brain adaptations are primarily associated with fibromyalgia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
For this study the authors received funding from the National Institutes of Health K99/R00 DA040154 (K.T.M.), and from the Redlich Pain Research Endowment (Dr. Sean Mackey, Stanford University, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee/IRB of Duke University gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
