Summary
Background Clinical research studies have made significant strides globally requiring clear processes to transition research interventions into clinical practice. Theoretically, implementation of novel interventions require clear methods as part of a fit-for-purpose (FFP) framework comprising of effective adaptation processes in conjunction with practice policies. Implementation science (IS) based operational research (OR) is vital in global health as it addresses the ‘know-how-do’ gap using a real-world setting to achieve best practices to sustain healthcare. Despite this, limited OR is available to evaluate and validate implementation frameworks for complex clinical specialties such as oncology, diagnostic radiology (DR), nuclear medicine (NM) and interventional radiology (IR). This is the first study to systematically review implementation frameworks including its’ validity and applicability in healthcare.
Method We searched 17 databases including PubMed, Medline/OvidSP, Science Direct, PROSPERO, PRISMA, PubMed Health, Embase, EBSCOhost, SciELO, TRIP, ProQuest, Academic search complete, Ageline, Cochrane, Web-of-Science and BIOSIS using a comprehensive search strategy and MeSH indexing to review publications from January 1st 1980 to 31st March 2019 in English. We selected 20 publications as per the inclusion/exclusion criteria developed under a review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRDG42019124020).
Findings There were no publications indicating a validated framework or a specific system used to implement evidence based interventions (EBIs) within oncology, IR, NM and DR although there were generalized implementation processes, adaptation models and policies. Furthermore, validation studies were not conducted against these frameworks to review their applicability and viability in healthcare especially in the UK.
Interpretation It is evident there is a research implementation gap in healthcare and further research is required to establish a fit for purpose framework to cover multiple ‘blind spots’ using a real-world (RW) setting. Current evidence also suggests, alignment of academic theories to healthcare including its applicability to various clinical specialties is needed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
