Abstract
Objective To determine the continuity of care (CoC) provided by general practitioners among workers with low back pain; identify personal, workplace and social factors associated with CoC in this population; and investigate if CoC is associated with working time loss.
Data sources An administrative database containing accepted workers’ compensation claim and service level data, for workers with back pain from five Australian jurisdictions, injured between July 2010 and June 2015.
Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Outcomes were CoC with a general practitioner, measured with the Usual Provider Continuity index, and working time loss, measured as the number of weeks for which workers’ compensation income support benefits were paid.
Extraction methods Eligible workers had at least four general practitioner services, and greater than two weeks working time loss. Usual Provider Continuity index score was categorised as complete, high, moderate, or low CoC. Ordinal logistic regression models examined factors associated with Usual Provider Continuity category. Quantile regression models examined association between duration of working time loss and Usual Provider Continuity category, in four groups with different volumes of general practitioner services.
Principal Findings Complete CoC was observed in 33.8% of workers, high CoC among 37.7%, moderate CoC in 22.1%, and low CoC in 6.4%. Higher Usual Provider Continuity was associated with fewer general practitioner services, older age, living in urban areas, an occupation as a Community and Personal Service Worker or Clerical and Administrative Worker, and the state of Victoria. In workers with more than two months of time loss, those with complete CoC consistently had shorter durations of time loss.
Conclusions Higher CoC with a general practitioner is associated with less working time loss and this relationship is strongest in the sub-acute phase of low back pain.
What is known on this topic
Continuity of care is a key component of best practice primary care
Low back pain is a condition that often requires ongoing management and care from a general practitioner
The relationship between continuity of care and work disability duration, recovery and return to work in workers with low back pain is not known
What this study adds
Workers with low back pain who see the same general practitioner for all services (i.e., have a greater continuity of care) generally have shorter durations of working time loss
Higher continuity of care was observed in workers who had fewer PCP services, were aged over 45, lived in urban areas, and worked as a Community and Personal Service Worker or Clerical and Administrative Worker
Workers’ compensation systems should consider policies and guidelines that increase continuity of care in injured workers
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project was provided by a Discovery Project Grant (DP190102473) from the Australian Research Council and a grant from Safe Work Australia.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval has been received from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 17267, November 2018).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data used in this paper was provided to the authors by the workers' compensation authorities and are not available for distribution by the authors.
