Abstract
Background Medical schools are challenged to guard student wellbeing due to the potential negative impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on top of the already high prevalence of mental distress. Whereas social support is generally associated with less crisis-induced stress, it is unknown whether this applies to medical students during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Objectives The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on perceived stress of medical students was assessed by comparing their perceived stress levels during the outbreak to both their own baseline and the previous cohort’s pre-COVID-19 stress levels. Then, the association between social support and COVID-19 induced stress was assessed.
Methods Dutch Year-1 medical students of cohort 2019 (n=99) completed the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14) at two time points: baseline (pre-COVID-19) and final measurement (COVID-19). Social support - emotional-informational support and club membership - was assessed during the final measurement. PSS and social support scores were compared to similar measurements of cohort 2018 (n=196). Students’ baseline stress levels, gender and study performance were controlled for when comparing two cohorts.
Results Stress levels did not differ statistically significant between both pre-COVID-19 measurements of cohort 2018 and baseline cohort 2019. During the COVID-19 outbreak, cohort 2019 showed significantly higher stress levels compared to baseline (paired t-test: t=6.07, p<.001) and compared to cohort 2018 (linear regression: B=4.186, p<.001). Only during the COVID-19 outbreak, higher levels of social support - i.e. emotional-informational support (B=-0.75, p<.001) and club membership (B=-3.68, p<.01) - were associated with lower levels of stress.
Conclusions During the COVID-19 outbreak, the perceived stress of medical students was higher - especially for students with lower levels of social support. Our results suggest that medical schools should optimize social support to minimize crisis-induced stress.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was deemed exempt from review after evaluation by the Medical Ethics Committee of Erasmus MC Rotterdam (MEC-2019-0448).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
For the sake of confidentiality, full data are not publicly accessible. Additional anonymized data is available upon reasonable request to the authors.
