Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Deep learning-based prognosis models accurately predict the time to delivery among preeclampsia patients using health records at the time of diagnosis

Xiaotong Yang, Hailey K Ballard, Aditya D Mahadevan, Ke Xu, David G Garmire, Elizabeth S Langen, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.03.22273366
Xiaotong Yang
1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hailey K Ballard
2Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aditya D Mahadevan
4Department of Physiology and Aging, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
5Center for Research in Perinatal Outcomes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ke Xu
2Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
5Center for Research in Perinatal Outcomes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David G Garmire
6Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth S Langen
7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dominick J Lemas
2Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
3Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
5Center for Research in Perinatal Outcomes, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lana X Garmire
1Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lgarmire{at}umich.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Preeclampsia (PE) is one of the leading factors in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity worldwide with no known cure. Delivery timing is key to balancing maternal and fetal risk in pregnancies complicated by PE. Delivery timing of PE patients is traditionally determined by closely monitoring over a prolonged time. We developed and externally validated a deep learning models that can predict the time to delivery of PE patients, based on electronic health records (EHR) data by the time of the initial diagnosis, in the hope of reducing the need for close monitoring.

Method Using the deep-learning survival model (Cox-nnet), we constructed time-to-delivery prediction models for all PE patients and early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE) patients. The discovery cohort consisted of 1,533 PE cases, including 374 EOPE, that were delivered at the University of Michigan Health System (UM) between 2015 and 2021. The validation cohort contained 2,172 PE cases (547 EOPE) from the University of Florida Health System (UF) in the same time period. We built clinically informative baseline models from 45 pre-diagnosis clinical variables that include demographics, medical history, comorbidity, PE severity, and initial diagnosis gestational age features. We also built full models from 60 clinical variables that include additional 15 lab tests and vital signs features around the time of diagnosis.

Results The 7-feature baseline models on all PE patients reached C-indices of 0.74 and 0.73 on UM hold-out testing and UF validation dataset respectively, whereas the 12-feature full model had improved C-indices of 0.79 and 0.74 on the same datasets. For the more urgent EOPE cases, the 6-feature baseline model achieved C-indices of 0.68 and 0.63, and its 13-feature full model counterpart reached C-indices of 0.76 and 0.67 in the same datasets.

Conclusions We successfully developed and externally validated an accurate deep-learning model for time-to-delivery prediction among PE patients at the time of diagnosis, which helps to prepare clinicians and patients for expected deliveries.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

LXG was supported by grants R01 LM012373 and LM012907 awarded by NLM, R01 HD084633 awarded by NICHD. DJL was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK115632) and the University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1TR001427). XY is supported by NIH/NIGMS Grant T32GM141746. AM is supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (5TL1TR001428).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of the University of Michigan Medical School gave ethical approval for this work(HUM#00168171).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • This version of manuscript has been revised to update the introduction and discussion sections

  • Abbreviations

    PE
    preeclampsia
    sPE
    Preeclampsia with severe features
    EOPE
    early-onset preeclampsia
    LOPE
    late-onset preeclampsia
    EHR
    electronic health record
    SBP
    systolic blood pressure
    DBP
    diastolic blood pressure
    RR
    respiratory rate
    HELLP
    hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count
    AST
    aspartate transaminase
    PI
    prognosis score
    UM
    University of Michigan
    UF
    University of Florida
    ICD-10
    The International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
    MAP
    mean arterial pressure
    UtA-PI
    uterine artery pulsatility index
    PLGF
    placental growth factor
    ACOG
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist
    AUROC
    Area Under the Receiver-Operator curve
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted August 09, 2024.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Deep learning-based prognosis models accurately predict the time to delivery among preeclampsia patients using health records at the time of diagnosis
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Deep learning-based prognosis models accurately predict the time to delivery among preeclampsia patients using health records at the time of diagnosis
    Xiaotong Yang, Hailey K Ballard, Aditya D Mahadevan, Ke Xu, David G Garmire, Elizabeth S Langen, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
    medRxiv 2022.04.03.22273366; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.03.22273366
    Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Deep learning-based prognosis models accurately predict the time to delivery among preeclampsia patients using health records at the time of diagnosis
    Xiaotong Yang, Hailey K Ballard, Aditya D Mahadevan, Ke Xu, David G Garmire, Elizabeth S Langen, Dominick J Lemas, Lana X Garmire
    medRxiv 2022.04.03.22273366; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.03.22273366

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (349)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Allergy and Immunology (668)
    • Anesthesia (181)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
    • Dermatology (223)
    • Emergency Medicine (399)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
    • Epidemiology (12228)
    • Forensic Medicine (10)
    • Gastroenterology (759)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
    • Geriatric Medicine (387)
    • Health Economics (680)
    • Health Informatics (2657)
    • Health Policy (1005)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
    • Hematology (363)
    • HIV/AIDS (851)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
    • Medical Education (399)
    • Medical Ethics (109)
    • Nephrology (436)
    • Neurology (3882)
    • Nursing (209)
    • Nutrition (577)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
    • Oncology (2030)
    • Ophthalmology (585)
    • Orthopedics (240)
    • Otolaryngology (306)
    • Pain Medicine (250)
    • Palliative Medicine (75)
    • Pathology (473)
    • Pediatrics (1115)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
    • Primary Care Research (452)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
    • Public and Global Health (6527)
    • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
    • Respiratory Medicine (871)
    • Rheumatology (409)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
    • Sports Medicine (342)
    • Surgery (448)
    • Toxicology (53)
    • Transplantation (185)
    • Urology (165)