Aging in India: Comparison of Conventional and Prospective Measures, 2011

Ankita Srivastava; Saikia Nandita

doi:10.1101/2022.04.11.22273700

Abstract

Conventional measurements of aging do not take into account the dynamic nature of aging-related characteristics over time. Therefore, in order to refine the estimates of aging, demographers have proposed prospective measures based on remaining life expectancy, Sanderson and Scherbov (2007). We compared these new measures with conventional aging measures using the data from the Census of India 2011 and Sample Registration System life tables 2009–2013. In conventional aging measures, we used life expectancy at age 60 and the old age dependency ratio (OADR), whereas for new measures of aging, we applied the threshold of old age based on the remaining life expectancy and prospective old age dependency ratio (POADR). Both measures of aging provided different estimates of the aging population at the national and subnational levels. At national level, application of prospective measures increased the number of older dependents from 66.4 million to 71.8 million (OADR: 8.6% vs. POADR: 10.6%). We observed profound variation at sub-national level in India. We also observed that the prospective ageing measures not only provided higher estimates of ageing burden in India, but also altered the gender and rural urban differential in ageing. Considering the heterogeneity of life expectancies across Indian states, prospective measures provide more accurate refined estimates of aging burden in India as they are based on length of life expectancy. Application of these measures has great policy relevance in India.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study is funded by the Indian Council of Social Science Research Doctoral Fellowship and part of the research is funded by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (Austria) with financial support from the IIASA YSSP FUND 2018.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

https://censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/censusdata2011.html

https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Statistical_Report.html

https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/Appendix_SRS_Based_Life_Table.html

The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.