Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Evaluation of machine learning for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from a national electronic medical records database

Sean Browning, Scott H. Lee, Ermias Belay, Jennifer DeCuir, Shana Godfred Cato, Pragna Patel, Noah Schwartz, Karen K. Wong
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.13.22273835
Sean Browning
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott H. Lee
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yle4{at}cdc.gov
Ermias Belay
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer DeCuir
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shana Godfred Cato
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pragna Patel
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noah Schwartz
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen K. Wong
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective When novel diseases such as COVID-19 emerge, predictors of clinical outcomes might be unknown. Using data from electronic medical records (EMR) allows evaluation of potential predictors without selecting specific features a priori for a model. We evaluated different machine learning models for predicting outcomes among COVID-19 inpatients using raw EMR data.

Materials and Methods In Premier Healthcare Data Special Release: COVID-19 Edition (PHD-SR COVID-19, release date March, 24 2021), we included patients admitted with COVID-19 during February 2020 through April 2021 and built time-ordered medical histories. Setting the prediction horizon at 24 hours into the first COVID-19 inpatient visit, we aimed to predict intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hyperinflammatory syndrome (HS), and death. We evaluated the following models: L2-penalized logistic regression, random forest, gradient boosting classifier, deep averaging network, and recurrent neural network with a long short-term memory cell.

Results There were 57,355 COVID-19 patients identified in PHD-SR COVID-19. ICU admission was the easiest outcome to predict (best AUC=79%), and HS was the hardest to predict (best AUC=70%). Models performed similarly within each outcome.

Discussion Although the models learned to attend to meaningful clinical information, they performed similarly, suggesting performance limitations are inherent to the data.

Conclusion Predictive models using raw EMR data are promising because they can use many observations and encompass a large feature space; however, traditional and deep learning models may perform similarly when few features are available at the individual patient level.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The Institutional Review Board of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention waived ethical approval for this work because the disclosed Premier Healthcare Database Special COVID-19 Release data are considered de-identified.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced are available from Premier Inc. as the PINC-AI Healthcare Data Special Release: COVID-19.

https://offers.premierinc.com/PINC-AI-Healthcare-Data-COVID-Whitepaper-LandingPage.html

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. This article is a US Government work. It is not subject to copyright under 17 USC 105 and is also made available for use under a CC0 license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 14, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of machine learning for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from a national electronic medical records database
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evaluation of machine learning for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from a national electronic medical records database
Sean Browning, Scott H. Lee, Ermias Belay, Jennifer DeCuir, Shana Godfred Cato, Pragna Patel, Noah Schwartz, Karen K. Wong
medRxiv 2022.04.13.22273835; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.13.22273835
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Evaluation of machine learning for predicting COVID-19 outcomes from a national electronic medical records database
Sean Browning, Scott H. Lee, Ermias Belay, Jennifer DeCuir, Shana Godfred Cato, Pragna Patel, Noah Schwartz, Karen K. Wong
medRxiv 2022.04.13.22273835; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.13.22273835

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)