Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Acceptability of a Daily COVID-19 Testing Regimen with a Mobile-App Connected, At-Home, Rapid Antigen Test: Implications for Current and Future Pandemics

Nadia Nguyen, Benjamin Lane, Sangwon Lee, Sharon Lipsky Gorman, View ORCID ProfileYumeng Wu, Alicia Li, Helen Lu, Noemie Elhadad, Michael Yin, View ORCID ProfileKathrine Meyers
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.18.22273982
Nadia Nguyen
1The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University, 701 W. 168th Street, HHSC 1102, New York, NY 10032
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Lane
1The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University, 701 W. 168th Street, HHSC 1102, New York, NY 10032
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sangwon Lee
2Columbia University Department of Biomedical Engineering, 1210 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharon Lipsky Gorman
3Columbia University Department of Biomedical Informatics, 622 West 168th Street, PH20 3720, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yumeng Wu
1The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University, 701 W. 168th Street, HHSC 1102, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yumeng Wu
Alicia Li
4Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 W 168th Street, New York, NY 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Lu
2Columbia University Department of Biomedical Engineering, 1210 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY 10027
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noemie Elhadad
3Columbia University Department of Biomedical Informatics, 622 West 168th Street, PH20 3720, New York, NY 10032
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Yin
5Columbia University Department of Medicine, 630 West 168th Street, PH 8 East Room 105, New York, NY 10032
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathrine Meyers
1The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Columbia University, 701 W. 168th Street, HHSC 1102, New York, NY 10032
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kathrine Meyers
  • For correspondence: kam2157{at}cumc.columbia.edu
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Widespread use of at-home rapid COVID-19 antigen tests has been proposed as an important public health intervention to interrupt chains of transmission. Antigen tests may be preferred over PCR because they provide on-demand results for relatively low cost and can identify people when they are most likely to be infectious, particularly when used daily. Yet the extent to which a frequent antigen testing intervention will result in a positive public health impact for COVID-19 will depend on high acceptability and high adherence to such regimens.

Methods We conducted a mixed-methods study assessing acceptability of and adherence to a daily at-home mobile-app connected rapid antigen testing regimen among employees of a US-based media company. Acceptability was assessed across seven domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Results Among 31 study participants, acceptability of the daily testing intervention was generally high, with participants reporting high perceived effectiveness, intervention coherence, and self-efficacy; positive affective attitude; acceptable degree of burden and opportunity cost; and assessing the intervention as ethical. 71% reported a preference to test daily using an at-home antigen test than weekly employment-based PCR. Mean adherence to the 21-day testing regimen was 88% with 43% of participants achieving 100% adherence, 48% testing at least every other day, and 10% testing less than every other day.

Conclusions Despite overall high acceptability and adherence, we identified three implementation challenges that must be addressed for frequent serial testing for COVID-19 to be implemented at scale and have a positive public health impact. First, users need guidance on how and when to adapt testing frequencies to different epidemiological conditions. Second, users and institutions need guidelines for how to safely store and share test results. Third, implementation of serial testing strategies must prioritize health equity and protect those most vulnerable to COVID-19.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. NN, BL, MY, and KM are involved in completing clinical studies of the COVID-19 antigen test on behalf of BioMedomics Inc. for submission to the FDA. SL, SLG, HL, and NE were involved in the development of the paired mobile application which has been licensed to BioMedomics Inc. BioMedomics had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

All study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Columbia University Irving Medical Center's Institutional Review Board. All study participants signed an informed consent form before participating in the study.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • bvl2110{at}cumc.columbia.edu

  • Declaration of Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. NN, BL, MY, and KM are involved in completing clinical studies of the COVID-19 antigen test on behalf of BioMedomics Inc. for submission to the FDA. SL, SLG, HL, and NE were involved in the development of the paired mobile application which has been licensed to BioMedomics Inc. BioMedomics had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability

The data cannot be shared publicly because of ethical restrictions and data protection issues as our dataset includes potentially identifying information.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 19, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Acceptability of a Daily COVID-19 Testing Regimen with a Mobile-App Connected, At-Home, Rapid Antigen Test: Implications for Current and Future Pandemics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Acceptability of a Daily COVID-19 Testing Regimen with a Mobile-App Connected, At-Home, Rapid Antigen Test: Implications for Current and Future Pandemics
Nadia Nguyen, Benjamin Lane, Sangwon Lee, Sharon Lipsky Gorman, Yumeng Wu, Alicia Li, Helen Lu, Noemie Elhadad, Michael Yin, Kathrine Meyers
medRxiv 2022.04.18.22273982; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.18.22273982
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Mixed Methods Study Evaluating Acceptability of a Daily COVID-19 Testing Regimen with a Mobile-App Connected, At-Home, Rapid Antigen Test: Implications for Current and Future Pandemics
Nadia Nguyen, Benjamin Lane, Sangwon Lee, Sharon Lipsky Gorman, Yumeng Wu, Alicia Li, Helen Lu, Noemie Elhadad, Michael Yin, Kathrine Meyers
medRxiv 2022.04.18.22273982; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.18.22273982

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)