ABSTRACT
Objectives Studies suggest that body composition can be independently improved through physical activity (PA). We performed a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to test the incremental benefits of sedentary behavior and various physical activity (PA) exposures on body composition outcomes as assessed by anthropometric indices, lean body mass (LBM) (kg), body fat (%), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) (kg).
Methods Genetic instruments were identified for both self-reported and accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior and PA. Outcomes included anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures of adiposity, extracted from the UK Biobank and the largest available consortia. Multivariable MR (MVMR) included educational attainment as a covariate to address potential confounding. Sensitivity analyses were evaluated for weak instrument bias and pleiotropic effects.
Results We did not identify consistent associations between genetically-predicted self-reported and accelerometer-measured sedentary behavior and body composition outcomes. All analyses for self-reported moderate PA were null for body composition outcomes. Genetically-predicted PA at higher intensities was protective against VAT in MR and MVMR analyses of both accelerometer-measured vigorous PA (MVMR β = -0.15, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.24, -0.07, p<0.001) and self-reported participation in strenuous sports or other exercises (MVMR β = -0.27, 95%CI: -0.52, -0.01, p=0.034) was robust across several sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions We did not identify evidence of a causal relationship between genetically-predicted PA and body composition, with the exception of a putatively protective effect of higher-intensity PA on VAT. Protective effects of PA against VAT may support prior evidence of biological pathways through which PA decreases risk of downstream cardiometabolic diseases.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval to obtain and disseminate data and samples from the participants (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/ethics/), and these regulations cover the work in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
GWAS summary statistics derived as part of this study will be made publicly available in the GWAS Catalog.
