ABSTRACT
Question How do physiotherapists use different motivational strategies for individuals in stroke rehabilitation?
Design A qualitative study using in-depth semi-structured online interviews.
Participants A criterion sample of 15 physiotherapists who have worked in rehabilitation for over 10 years and have an interest in an individual’s motivation.
Intervention Not applicable.
Outcome measures Physiotherapists’ perspectives and experiences regarding motivational strategies used depending on the individual’s condition.
Results A total of nine themes emerged from the data upon thematic analysis and inductive coding. The participants used different strategies to encourage individuals’ active participation in physiotherapy depending on their (1) mental health problems, (2) physical difficulties, (3) level of cognitive function, (4) personality, (5) activities and participation, (6) age, (7) human environment, and (8) type of rehabilitation service where the individual undergoes treatment. For example, in cases where an individual lost self-confidence, participants offered practice tasks that the individual could achieve with little effort to make them experience success. Conversely, for individuals with overconfidence, participants would provide them with a relatively difficult practice task to help them realize the necessity of practice through the experience of failure. The interviews also revealed (9) motivational strategies used regardless of the individual’s condition. For instance, patient-centred communication was used to build a rapport with individuals, irrespective of their condition.
Conclusion This qualitative study is the first to demonstrate motivational strategies that physiotherapists use based on the individual’s condition. Our findings provide a deeper understanding of the selection of motivational strategies in stroke rehabilitation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a JSPS KAKENHI grant to ST (20K21752).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Review Boards of the Shinshu University (approval number: 4830) and of the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (approval number: 20-206) gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
keitasue{at}live.jp
motofumisumiya{at}gmail.com
tanakas{at}hama-med.ac.jp
Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Shinshu University (approval number: 4830) and at the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine (approval number: 20-206). All participants provided written informed consent before enrolment in the study. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964, as revised in 2013.
Competing interests: None
Source(s) of support: This work was supported by a JSPS KAKENHI grant to ST (20K21752). The funding source had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
