Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Disruption of long-term psychological distress trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from three British birth cohorts

View ORCID ProfileDarío Moreno-Agostino, View ORCID ProfileHelen L. Fisher, Alissa Goodman, View ORCID ProfileStephani L Hatch, View ORCID ProfileCraig Morgan, View ORCID ProfileMarcus Richards, View ORCID ProfileJayati Das-Munshi, View ORCID ProfileGeorge B. Ploubidis
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.22.22274164
Darío Moreno-Agostino
1Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London; 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Darío Moreno-Agostino
  • For correspondence: d.moreno{at}ucl.ac.uk
Helen L. Fisher
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
3King’s College London, Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Helen L. Fisher
Alissa Goodman
1Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London; 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephani L Hatch
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
4King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephani L Hatch
Craig Morgan
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
5Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Craig Morgan
Marcus Richards
6MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, WC1E 7HB London, UK
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marcus Richards
Jayati Das-Munshi
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
4King’s College London, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
7South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jayati Das-Munshi
George B. Ploubidis
1Centre for Longitudinal Studies, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London; 55-59 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom
2ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, King’s College London, Melbourne House, 44-46 Aldwych, London WC2B 4LL, United Kingdom
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for George B. Ploubidis
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Importance Mental health disorders were among the leading global contributors to years lived with disability prior to the COVID-19 pandemic onset, and growing evidence suggests that population mental health outcomes have worsened since the pandemic started. The extent that these changes have altered common age-related trends in psychological distress, where distress typically rises until mid-life and then falls in both sexes, is unknown.

Objective To analyse whether long-term pre-pandemic psychological distress trajectories have altered during the pandemic, and whether these changes have been different across generations and by sex.

Design Cross-cohort study with prospective data collection over a 40-year period (earliest time point: 1981; latest time point: February/March 2021).

Setting Population-based (adult general population), Great Britain.

Participants Members of three nationally representative birth cohorts which comprised all people born in Great Britain in a single week of 1946, 1958, or 1970, and who participated in at least one of the data collection waves conducted after the start of the pandemic (40.6%, 42.8%, 39.4%, respectively).

Exposure(s) Time, COVID-19 pandemic.

Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s) Psychological distress factor scores, as measured by validated self-reported questionnaires.

Results 16,389 participants (2,175 from the 1946 birth cohort, 52.8% women; 7,446 from the 1958 birth cohort, 52.4% women; and 6,768 from the 1970 birth cohort, 56.2% women) participated in the study. By September/October 2020, psychological distress levels had reached or exceeded the levels of the peak in the pre-pandemic life-course trajectories, with larger increases in younger cohorts: Standardised Mean Differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of -0.02 [-0.07, 0.04], 0.05 [0.02, 0.07], and 0.09 [0.07, 0.12] for the 1946, 1958, and 1970 birth cohorts, respectively. Increases in distress were larger among women than men, widening the pre-existing inequalities observed in the pre-pandemic peak and in the most recent pre-pandemic assessment.

Conclusions and Relevance Pre-existing long-term psychological distress trajectories of adults born between 1946 and 1970 were disrupted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among women, who reached the highest levels ever recorded in up to 40 years of follow-up data. This may impact future trends of morbidity, disability, and mortality due to common mental health problems.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This paper represents independent research part supported by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre for Society and Mental Health at King's College London [ES/S012567/1]. DM, HLF, SLH, CM, JD, and GBP are part supported by the ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health at King's College London [ES/S012567/1]. SLH, CM, and JD are also supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and JD is also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. MR is supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) [MC_UU_00019/3]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the ESRC, NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, MRC, or King's College London. The British Cohort Study 1970 and National Child Development Study 1958 are supported by the Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Resource Centre 2015-20 grant [ES/M001660/1] and a host of other co-funders. The NSHD cohort is hosted by the MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing at UCL funded by the MRC [MC_UU_00019/1Theme 1: Cohorts and Data Collection]. The COVID-19 data collections in these five cohorts were funded by the UKRI grant Understanding the economic, social and health impacts of COVID-19 using lifetime data: evidence from 5 nationally representative UK cohorts [ES/V012789/1].

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The most recent sweeps of the British Cohort Study (BCS70), the National Child Development Study (NCDS), and the National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) have all been granted ethical approval by the National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committee and all participants have given informed consent. No additional ethical approval was necessary for this secondary data analysis.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint senior authors

Data Availability

Data for the British Cohort Study (BCS70, SN 8547), the National Child Development Study (NCDS, SN 6137), and the COVID-19 surveys (SN 8658) are available from the UK Data Service (https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/). Deidentified data and documentation on the National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD) are available under request (https://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data).

https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/

https://www.nshd.mrc.ac.uk/data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 22, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disruption of long-term psychological distress trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from three British birth cohorts
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Disruption of long-term psychological distress trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from three British birth cohorts
Darío Moreno-Agostino, Helen L. Fisher, Alissa Goodman, Stephani L Hatch, Craig Morgan, Marcus Richards, Jayati Das-Munshi, George B. Ploubidis
medRxiv 2022.04.22.22274164; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.22.22274164
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Disruption of long-term psychological distress trajectories during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from three British birth cohorts
Darío Moreno-Agostino, Helen L. Fisher, Alissa Goodman, Stephani L Hatch, Craig Morgan, Marcus Richards, Jayati Das-Munshi, George B. Ploubidis
medRxiv 2022.04.22.22274164; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.22.22274164

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (349)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Allergy and Immunology (668)
  • Anesthesia (181)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (2648)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (316)
  • Dermatology (223)
  • Emergency Medicine (399)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (942)
  • Epidemiology (12228)
  • Forensic Medicine (10)
  • Gastroenterology (759)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (4103)
  • Geriatric Medicine (387)
  • Health Economics (680)
  • Health Informatics (2657)
  • Health Policy (1005)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (985)
  • Hematology (363)
  • HIV/AIDS (851)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (13695)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (797)
  • Medical Education (399)
  • Medical Ethics (109)
  • Nephrology (436)
  • Neurology (3882)
  • Nursing (209)
  • Nutrition (577)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (739)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (695)
  • Oncology (2030)
  • Ophthalmology (585)
  • Orthopedics (240)
  • Otolaryngology (306)
  • Pain Medicine (250)
  • Palliative Medicine (75)
  • Pathology (473)
  • Pediatrics (1115)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (466)
  • Primary Care Research (452)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (3432)
  • Public and Global Health (6527)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1403)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (814)
  • Respiratory Medicine (871)
  • Rheumatology (409)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (410)
  • Sports Medicine (342)
  • Surgery (448)
  • Toxicology (53)
  • Transplantation (185)
  • Urology (165)