Abstract
Background Generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models are one of the latest large pre-trained natural language processing (NLP) models, which enables model training with limited datasets, and reduces dependency on large datasets which are scarce and costly to establish and maintain. There is a rising interest to explore the use of GPT models in healthcare.
Objective We investigate the performance of GPT-2 and GPT-Neo models for medical text prediction using 374,787 free-text dental notes.
Methods We fine-tune pre-trained GPT-2 and GPT-Neo models for next word prediction on a dataset of over 374,000 manually written sections of dental clinical notes. Each model was trained on 80% of the dataset, validated on 10%, and tested on the remaining 10%. We report model performance in terms of next word prediction accuracy and loss. Additionally, we analyze the performance of the models on different types of prediction tokens for categories. We annotate each token in 100 randomly sampled notes by category (e.g. Names, Abbreviations, Clinical Terms, Punctuation, etc.) and compare the performance of each model by token category.
Results Models present acceptable accuracy scores (GPT-2: 76%, GPT-Neo: 53%), and the GPT-2 model also performs better in manual evaluations, especially for names, abbreviations, and punctuation. The results suggest that pre-trained models have the potential to assist medical charting in the future. We share the lessons learned, insights, and suggestions for future implementations.
Conclusion The results suggest that pre-trained models have the potential to assist medical charting in the future. Our study presented one of the first implementations of the GPT model used with medical notes.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by Award Number UL1TR002733 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Nationwide Children's Hospital (IRB No: 00000877).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The dataset used in this study include private and sensitive information (e.g., medical records, personal health information) which cannot be shared publicly.
